| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Allegro Marketing hpb seo plugin for WordPress hpbseo allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects hpb seo plugin for WordPress: from n/a through <= 3.0.1. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Plechev Andrey WP-Recall.This issue affects WP-Recall: from n/a through 16.26.6. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Uploadcare Uploadcare File Uploader and Adaptive Delivery (beta) uploadcare.This issue affects Uploadcare File Uploader and Adaptive Delivery (beta): from n/a through 3.0.11. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in CRM Perks. Integration for Contact Form 7 and Constant Contact.This issue affects Integration for Contact Form 7 and Constant Contact: from n/a through 1.1.5. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in JumpDEMAND Inc. ActiveDEMAND.This issue affects ActiveDEMAND: from n/a through 0.2.43. |
| The WP-Orphanage Extended plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wporphanageex_menu_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to escalate the privileges of all orphan accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in VolThemes Patricia Lite.This issue affects Patricia Lite: from n/a through 1.2.3. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Seraphinite Solutions Seraphinite Accelerator (Full, premium).This issue affects Seraphinite Accelerator (Full, premium): from n/a through 2.21.13. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Internal Link Juicer Internal Link Juicer: SEO Auto Linker for WordPress.This issue affects Internal Link Juicer: SEO Auto Linker for WordPress: from n/a through 2.24.3. |
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in GROWI v7.3.3 and earlier. If a user views a malicious page while logged in, the user may be tricked to do unintended operations. |
| Insecure handling of GET header parameter file included in requests being sent to an instance of the open-source project Phoniebox allows an attacker to create a website, which – when visited by a user – will send malicious requests to multiple hosts on the local network. If such a request reaches the server, it will cause one of the following (depending on the chosen payload): shell command execution, reflected XSS or cross-site request forgery.
This issue affects Phoniebox in all releases through 2.7. Newer 2.x releases were not tested, but they might also be vulnerable.
Phoniebox in version 3.0 and higher are not affected. |
| SAP Commerce, by default, sets certain cookies with the SameSite attribute configured to None (SameSite=None). This includes authentication cookies utilized in SAP Commerce Backoffice. Applying this setting reduces defense in depth against CSRF and may lead to future compatibility issues. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Movistar's 4G router affecting version ES_WLD71-T1_v2.0.201820. This vulnerability allows an attacker to force an end user to execute unwanted actions in a web application in which they are currently authenticated. |
| A flaw was found in the Ansible aap-gateway. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) origin checking is not done on requests from the gateway to external components, such as the controller, hub, and eda. |
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability in multiple printers and scanners which implement Web Based Management provided by BROTHER INDUSTRIES, LTD. allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to perform unintended operations on the affected product. As for the details of affected product names, model numbers, and versions, refer to the information provided by the respective vendors listed under [References]. |
|
A potential security vulnerability has been identified in Hewlett Packard Enterprise OfficeConnect 1820 Network switches. The vulnerability could be remotely exploited to allow execution of malicious code.
|
| SOCIFI Socifi Guest wifi as SAAS is affected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Socifi wifi portal. The application does not contain a CSRF token and request validation. An attacker can Add/Modify any random user data by sending a crafted CSRF request. |
| ComfyUI-Impact-Pack is vulnerable to Path Traversal. The issue stems from missing validation of the `image.filename` field in a POST request sent to the `/upload/temp` endpoint added by the extension to the server. This results in writing arbitrary files to the file system which may, under some conditions, result in remote code execution (RCE). |
| The Related Posts, Inline Related Posts, Contextual Related Posts, Related Content By PickPlugins plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including 2.0.59. This is due to missing nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The web application is not protected against cross-site request forgery attacks. Therefore, an attacker can trick users into performing actions on the application when they visit an attacker-controlled website or click on a malicious link. E.g. an attacker can forge malicious links to reset the admin password or create new users. |
