| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability in the web framework of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CallManager) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against a user of the web interface of the affected software. More Information: CSCvb70021. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(1.11007.2). |
| Web2py versions 2.14.5 and below was affected by CSRF (Cross Site Request Forgery) vulnerability, which allows an attacker to trick a logged in user to perform some unwanted actions i.e An attacker can trick an victim to disable the installed application just by sending a URL to victim. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in L-04D firmware version V10a and V10b allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators to perform arbitrary operations via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators to execute arbitrary PHP code via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS plugin Mail version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS plugin Blog version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS plugin Blog version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS plugin Feed version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS plugin Mail version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS plugin Uploader version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SetsucoCMS all versions allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of an administrator to change settings via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP-OliveCart versions prior to 3.1.3 and WP-OliveCartPro versions prior to 3.1.8 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of a user to perform unintended operations via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cybozu Garoon 3.0.0 to 4.2.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of a logged in user to force a logout via unspecified vectors. |
| Cross site request forgery vulnerability in Junos Space before 15.2R2 allows remote attackers to perform certain administrative actions on Junos Space. |
| CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.2.16 with the value parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Colophon can be changed. |
| CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.2.16 with the value[#][*] parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Navigation Social can be changed. |
| Hawtio versions up to and including 1.5.3 are vulnerable to CSRF vulnerability allowing remote attackers to trick the user to visit their website containing a malicious script which can be submitted to hawtio server on behalf of the user. |
| dnsdist version 1.1.0 is vulnerable to a flaw in authentication mechanism for REST API potentially allowing CSRF attack. |