| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Missing filtering when the helmRepoURLRegex field isn't set on a GitRepo resource in SUSE Rancher Fleet's bundle reader in 0.15 before 0.15.2, 0.14 before 0.14.6, 0.13 before 0.13.11 and 0.12 before 0.12.15 forwards Helm authentication credentials (BasicAuth) to any URL specified in the helm.repo field of a fleet.yaml file, allowing attackers able to push to fleet monitored git repos to leak helm access credentials. |
| Potential forgery of webhook requests when using a unauthenticated webhook in SUSE Rancher Fleet 0.15 before 0.15.2, 0.14 before 0.14.6, 0.13 before 0.13.11 and 0.12 before 0.12.5 could be used by remote attackers to cause a denial of service or a downgrade attack on other repositories on the system. |
| The WP Import Export Lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to and including 3.9.30 via the wpie_import_upload_file_from_url AJAX action. The plugin's URL downloader first calls wp_safe_remote_get() (which correctly blocks private/reserved IP ranges), but when that call returns a WP_Error — the exact outcome for any blocked internal host — the Download::download_file() method falls back to GuzzleHttp\Client::request() with the original attacker-supplied URL and no SSRF protection (and with TLS verification disabled). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services such as the cloud metadata endpoint at 169. |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure OpenAI allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| Tencent Blueking CMDB v3.2.x to v3.9.x was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the event subscription function (/service/subscription.go). This vulnerability allows attackers to access internal requests via a crafted POST request. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in MicroStrategy Web SDK 11.1 and earlier, allows remote unauthenticated attackers to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack via the srcURL parameter to the shortURL task. |
| AutoBangumi before 3.2.8 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to probe internal network services by supplying arbitrary host values to an unprotected setup endpoint. Attackers can send requests to the POST /api/v1/setup/test-downloader endpoint during the initial setup window, causing the server to issue HTTP GET requests to internal or reserved addresses and leak information through echoed connection-error messages. |
| LobeChat before 2.2.10-canary.18 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to direct internal HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs by supplying user-controlled input to the skill import service (importFromUrl) and topic cover update (fetchImageFromUrl) endpoints, which use the global fetch without the project's ssrf-safe-fetch wrapper. Attackers can target internal addresses such as cloud instance metadata endpoints through these unprotected code paths to disclose internal service responses and cloud credentials. |
| Subscriber Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in GeoDirectory <= 2.8.161 versions. |
| Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). Versions 4.0.0-RC1 and above, prior to 4.18.0 and 5.0.0-RC1, and above, prior to 5.10.0, are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and Arbitrary JavaScript Injection through the /actions/app/resource-js endpoint. By exploiting the default permissive trustedHosts configuration, an attacker can poison the Host or X-Forwarded-Host header to manipulate the application’s $baseUrl. This bypasses the endpoint’s internal URL validation, forcing the backend Guzzle client to fetch a malicious payload from an attacker-controlled server and reflect it to the client with a Content-Type: application/javascript header. The vulnerability manifests when assetManager.cacheSourcePaths is set to false. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.18.0 and 5.10.0. |
| Versions of the package mcp-markdownify-server before 1.0.0 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the Markdownify.get() function. An attacker can craft a prompt that, once accessed by the MCP host, can invoke the webpage-to-markdown, bing-search-to-markdown, and youtube-to-markdown tools to issue requests and read the responses to attacker-controlled URLs, potentially leaking sensitive information. |
| Versions of the package github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/v8/pkg/gotenberg before 8.1.0; versions of the package github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/v8/pkg/modules/chromium before 8.1.0; versions of the package github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg/v8/pkg/modules/webhook before 8.1.0 are vulnerable to Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the /convert/html endpoint when a request is made to a file via localhost, such as <iframe src="\\localhost/etc/passwd">. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can achieve local file inclusion, allowing of sensitive files read on the host system.
Workaround
An alternative is using either or both --chromium-deny-list and --chromium-allow-list flags. |
| Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Paid Member Subscriptions <= 3.0.4 versions. |
| The payment integration pretix-oppwa provides support
for the payment providers VR Payment, Hobex, and potentially others
based on Oppwa's technology. The integration of Oppwa, following their
official documentation, includes a step where the user is redirected
from the payment provider back to our system with a query parameter like
?resourcePath=/v1/checkouts/{checkoutId}/payment in the URL. Our system is then supposed to fetch the status of the transaction from the URL given by baseUrl + resourcePath.
Our plugin pretix-oppwa did so insecurely by
concatenating the parameter form the URL to the base domain of the API
without further validation and, critically, without a / at the end of the baseUrl. Therefore, an attacker could inject a resourcePath argument in a way that causes pretix to call a different
server instead. Since the request includes the access token (API key)
of the Oppwa account, this would leak the access token, giving access to
data contained in the payment provider's system. This is fixed with the
release today by strictly validating the given API URL.
After installing the update, we recommend asking your payment provider for a new access token and updating it in pretix. |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks through an affected device.
This vulnerability is due to improper input validation for specific HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to write files to the underlying operating system that could be used later to elevate to root.
Note: Cisco has assigned this security advisory a Security Impact Rating (SIR) of Critical rather than High as the score indicates. The reason is that exploitation of this vulnerability could result in an attacker elevating privileges to root.
Note: To exploit this vulnerability, the WebDialer service must be enabled. WebDialer is disabled by default. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass vulnerability in the API Request component. An authenticated attacker with low-level privileges (flow author role) can bypass SSRF protections by enabling the follow_redirects parameter and supplying a public URL that redirects to internal/localhost addresses. The vulnerability exists because the application validates only the initial URL but does not re-validate redirect destinations. This allows attackers to access internal HTTP services, localhost endpoints, cloud metadata services, and private network resources that should be unreachable when SSRF protection is enabled. Successful exploitation can lead to disclosure of sensitive information including credentials, tokens, internal API responses, and administrative panel data. |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.7 is affected by a server-side request forgery vulnerability with the adminCenter-1.0 feature enabled. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The legacy RSSReaderComponent in rss.py and SearXNG component in searxng.py make unvalidated HTTP requests to user-controlled URLs, bypassing SSRF protections introduced in version 1.9.3. An authenticated attacker can exploit this to access internal resources including cloud metadata services (AWS/Azure/GCP IMDS), potentially exfiltrating IAM credentials and enumerating internal networks. The vulnerability can also be triggered through prompt injection in agentic workflows due to tool_mode=True exposure. |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.7 is affected by a server-side request forgery vulnerability with the apiDiscovery-1.0 feature enabled. |
| IBM watsonx.data intelligence 5.2.0, 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.3.0 s vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. |
