Export limit exceeded: 390709 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (27957 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-7416 | 1 Coffee2code | 1 Reveal Template Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Reveal Template plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 3.7. This is due to the plugin allowing direct access to the bootstrap.php file which has display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42903 | 1 Sap | 1 Financial Service Claims Management | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in SAP Financial Service Claims Management RFC function ICL_USER_GET_NAME_AND_ADDRESS allows user enumeration and potential disclosure of personal data through response discrepancies, causing low impact on confidentiality with no impact on integrity or availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43988 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| KuWFi 5G01-X55 FL2020_V0.0.12 devices expose an unauthenticated API endpoint (ajax_get.cgi), allowing remote attackers to retrieve sensitive configuration data, including admin credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36759 | 1 Solax | 1 Solax Cloud | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Through the provision of user names, SolaX Cloud will suggest (similar) user accounts and thereby leak sensitive information such as user email addresses and phone numbers. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38307 | 2026-04-15 | 7.7 High | ||
| Improper input validation in the firmware for some Intel(R) AMT and Intel(R) Standard Manageability may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via network access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32953 | 2026-04-15 | 8.7 High | ||
| z80pack is a mature emulator of multiple platforms with 8080 and Z80 CPU. In version 1.38 and prior, the `makefile-ubuntu.yml` workflow file uses `actions/upload-artifact@v4` to upload the `z80pack-ubuntu` artifact. This artifact is a zip of the current directory, which includes the automatically generated `.git/config` file containing the run's GITHUB_TOKEN. Seeing as the artifact can be downloaded prior to the end of the workflow, there is a few seconds where an attacker can extract the token from the artifact and use it with the Github API to push malicious code or rewrite release commits in your repository. This issue has been fixed in commit bd95916. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2786 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift Distributed Tracing | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Tempo Operator, where it creates a ServiceAccount, ClusterRole, and ClusterRoleBinding when a user deploys a TempoStack or TempoMonolithic instance. This flaw allows a user with full access to their namespace to extract the ServiceAccount token and use it to submit TokenReview and SubjectAccessReview requests, potentially revealing information about other users' permissions. While this does not allow privilege escalation or impersonation, it exposes information that could aid in gathering information for further attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52286 | 1 Stirlingpdf | 1 Stirling Pdf | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Stirling-PDF is a locally hosted web application that allows you to perform various operations on PDF files. In affected versions the Merge functionality takes untrusted user input (file name) and uses it directly in the creation of HTML pages allowing any unauthenticated to execute JavaScript code in the context of the user. The issue stems to the code starting at `Line 24` in `src/main/resources/static/js/merge.js`. The file name is directly being input into InnerHTML with no sanitization on the file name, allowing a malicious user to be able to upload files with names containing HTML tags. As HTML tags can include JavaScript code, this can be used to execute JavaScript code in the context of the user. This is a self-injection style attack and relies on a user uploading the malicious file themselves and it impact only them, not other users. A user might be social engineered into running this to launch a phishing attack. Nevertheless, this breaks the expected security restrictions in place by the application. This issue has been addressed in version 0.32.0 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-55272 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| An issue in Brainasoft Braina v2.8 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the chat window function. | ||||
| CVE-2025-47855 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortifone, Fortinet | 2026-04-15 | 9.3 Critical |
| An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor [CWE-200] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiFone 7.0.0 through 7.0.1, FortiFone 3.0.13 through 3.0.23 allows an unauthenticated attacker to obtain the device configuration via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13666 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Fluent Forms – Customizable Contact Forms, Survey, Quiz, & Conversational Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to IP Address Spoofing in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.12 due to insufficient IP address validation and use of user-supplied HTTP headers as a primary method for IP retrieval. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers spoof their IP address and submit forms that may have IP-based restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2910 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| User enumeration in the password reset module of the MeetMe authentication service in versions prior to 2024-09 allows an attacker to determine whether an email address is registered through specific error messages. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27537 | 1 Intel | 1 Edge Orchestrator Software | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| Improper input validation for some Edge Orchestrator software before version 24.11.1 for Intel(R) Tiber(TM) Edge Platform may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via adjacent access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27244 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| AssetView and AssetView CLOUD contain an issue with acquiring sensitive information from sent data to the developer. If exploited, sensitive information may be obtained by a remote unauthenticated attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27211 | 1 Ui | 1 Edgeswitch | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| An Improper Input Validation in EdgeMAX EdgeSwitch (Version 1.10.4 and earlier) could allow a Command Injection by a malicious actor with access to EdgeSwitch adjacent network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6563 | 1 Mikrotik | 1 Routeros | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A cross-site scripting vulnerability is present in the hotspot of MikroTik's RouterOS on versions below 7.19.2. An attacker can inject the `javascript` protocol in the `dst` parameter. When the victim browses to the malicious URL and logs in, the XSS executes. The POST request used to login, can also be converted to a GET request, allowing an attacker to send a specifically crafted URL that automatically logs in the victim (into the attacker's account) and triggers the payload. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26711 | 1 Zte | 1 T5400 | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| There is an unauthorized access vulnerability in ZTE T5400. Due to improper permission control of the Web module interface, an unauthorized attacker can obtain sensitive information through the interface. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26710 | 1 Zte | 1 T5400 | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low |
| There is an an information disclosure vulnerability in ZTE T5400. Due to improper configuration of the access control mechanism, attackers can obtain information through interfaces without authorization, causing the risk of information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2305 | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High | ||
| A Path traversal vulnerability in the file download functionality was identified. This vulnerability allows unauthenticated users to download arbitrary files, in the context of the application server, from the Linux server. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22233 | 2026-04-15 | 3.1 Low | ||
| CVE-2024-38820 ensured Locale-independent, lowercase conversion for both the configured disallowedFields patterns and for request parameter names. However, there are still cases where it is possible to bypass the disallowedFields checks. Affected Spring Products and Versions Spring Framework: * 6.2.0 - 6.2.6 * 6.1.0 - 6.1.19 * 6.0.0 - 6.0.27 * 5.3.0 - 5.3.42 * Older, unsupported versions are also affected Mitigation Users of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Affected version(s)Fix Version Availability 6.2.x 6.2.7 OSS6.1.x 6.1.20 OSS6.0.x 6.0.28 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ 5.3.x 5.3.43 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary. Generally, we recommend using a dedicated model object with properties only for data binding, or using constructor binding since constructor arguments explicitly declare what to bind together with turning off setter binding through the declarativeBinding flag. See the Model Design section in the reference documentation. For setting binding, prefer the use of allowedFields (an explicit list) over disallowedFields. Credit This issue was responsibly reported by the TERASOLUNA Framework Development Team from NTT DATA Group Corporation. | ||||