| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Sun Java JDK and JRE 5.0 Update 5 and earlier allow remote attackers to bypass Java sandbox security and obtain privileges via unspecified vectors involving the reflection APIs, aka the "fifth, sixth, and seventh issues." |
| Buffer overflow in the LDAP naming services library (libsldap) in Sun Solaris 8 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long LDAP_OPTIONS environment variable to a privileged program that uses libsldap. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Sun Java JDK and JRE 5.0 Update 4 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass Java sandbox security and obtain privileges via unspecified vectors involving the reflection APIs, aka the "fourth issue." |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Java Web Start after 1.0.1_02, as used in J2SE 5.0 Update 5 and earlier, allows remote attackers to obtain privileges via unspecified vectors involving untrusted applications. |
| pt_chmod in Solaris 8 does not call fdetach to reset terminal privileges when users log out of terminals, which allows local users to write to other users' terminals by modifying the ACL of a TTY. |
| NFS on SunOS 4.1 through 4.1.2 ignores the high order 16 bits in a 32 bit UID, which allows a local user to gain root access if the lower 16 bits are set to 0, as fixed by the NFS jumbo patch upgrade. |
| Solaris syslogd crashes when receiving a message from a host that doesn't have an inverse DNS entry. |
| A later variation on the Teardrop IP denial of service attack, a.k.a. Teardrop-2. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Sun Java JDK and JRE 5.0 Update 4 and earlier, SDK and JRE 1.4.x through 1.4.2_09 allow remote attackers to bypass Java sandbox security and obtain privileges via unspecified vectors involving the reflection APIs, aka the "second and third issues." |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Sun Java JDK and JRE 5.0 Update 3 and earlier, SDK and JRE 1.3.x through 1.3.1_16 and 1.4.x through 1.4.2_08 allows remote attackers to bypass Java sandbox security and obtain privileges via unspecified vectors involving the reflection APIs, aka the "first issue." |
| The finger daemon (in.fingerd) in Sun Solaris 2.5 through 8 and SunOS 5.5 through 5.8 allows remote attackers to list all accounts on a host by typing finger 'a b c d e f g h'@host. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Sun Java System Access Manager 7.0 allows local users logged in as "root" to bypass authentication and gain top-level administrator privileges via the amadmin CLI tool. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the kernel processing in Solaris 10 64 bit platform, when running in 64-bit mode, allows local users to cause a denial of service (system panic) via unknown attack vectors. |
| Java Runtime Environment (JRE) and SDK 1.2 through 1.3.0_04 allows untrusted applets to access the system clipboard. |
| The Sun Web-Based Enterprise Management (WBEM) installation script stores a password in plaintext in a world readable file. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in lpsched in Sun Solaris 8, 9, and 10 allow local users to delete arbitrary files or disable the LP print service via unknown attack vectors. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Sun Solaris 10 allows local users to cause a denial of service (null dereference) via unspecified vectors involving the use of the find command on the "/proc" filesystem. NOTE: due to the vagueness of the vendor advisory, it is not clear whether this is related to CVE-2005-3250. |
| The Basic Security Module (BSM) for Solaris 2.5.1, 2.6, 7, and 8 does not log anonymous FTP access, which allows remote attackers to hide their activities, possibly when certain BSM audit files are not present under the FTP root. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Sun Solaris 9 and 10 for the x86 platform allows local users to gain privileges or cause a denial of service (panic) via unspecified vectors, possibly involving functions from the mm driver. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in uucp in Sun Solaris 8 and 9 has unknown impact and attack vectors. NOTE: due to the vagueness of the vendor advisory, it is not clear whether this is related to CVE-2004-0780. |