Export limit exceeded: 387059 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2745 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-54470 | 1 Suse | 1 Neuvector | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| This vulnerability affects NeuVector deployments only when the Report anonymous cluster data option is enabled. When this option is enabled, NeuVector sends anonymous telemetry data to the telemetry server. In affected versions, NeuVector does not enforce TLS certificate verification when transmitting anonymous cluster data to the telemetry server. As a result, the communication channel is susceptible to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks, where an attacker could intercept or modify the transmitted data. Additionally, NeuVector loads the response of the telemetry server is loaded into memory without size limitation, which makes it vulnerable to a Denial of Service(DoS) attack | ||||
| CVE-2025-59036 | 1 Opsmill | 1 Infrahub | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| Infrahub offers a central hub to manage data, templates, and playbooks. Prior to versiond 1.3.9 and 1.4.5, a bug in the authentication logic will cause API tokens that were deleted and/or expired to be considered valid. This means that any API token that is associated with an active user account can authenticate successfully. This issue is fixed in versions 1.3.9 and 1.4.5. As a workaround, users can delete or deactivate the account associated with a deleted API token to prevent that token from authenticating. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48937 | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| matrix-rust-sdk is an implementation of a Matrix client-server library in Rust. matrix-sdk-crypto since version 0.8.0 and up to 0.11.0 does not correctly validate the sender of an encrypted event. Accordingly, a malicious homeserver operator can modify events served to clients, making those events appear to the recipient as if they were sent by another user. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1 and 0.12.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15573 | 2 Solax, Solax Power | 5 Pocket Wifi 3, Pocket Wifi+4gm, Pocket Wifi+lan and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.4 Critical |
| The affected devices do not validate the server certificate when connecting to the SolaX Cloud MQTTS server hosted in the Alibaba Cloud (mqtt001.solaxcloud.com, TCP 8883). This allows attackers in a man-in-the-middle position to act as the legitimate MQTT server and issue arbitrary commands to devices. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10125 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| The Amazon.ApplicationLoadBalancer.Identity.AspNetCore repo https://github.com/awslabs/aws-alb-identity-aspnetcore#validatetokensignature contains Middleware that can be used in conjunction with the Application Load Balancer (ALB) OpenId Connect integration and can be used in any ASP.NET https://dotnet.microsoft.com/apps/aspnet Core deployment scenario, including Fargate, EKS, ECS, EC2, and Lambda. In the JWT handling code, it performs signature validation but fails to validate the JWT issuer and signer identity. The signer omission, if combined with a scenario where the infrastructure owner allows internet traffic to the ALB targets (not a recommended configuration), can allow for JWT signing by an untrusted entity and an actor may be able to mimic valid OIDC-federated sessions to the ALB targets. The repository/package has been deprecated, is end of life, and is no longer supported. As a security best practice, ensure that your ELB targets (e.g. EC2 Instances, Fargate Tasks etc.) do not have public IP addresses. Ensure any forked or derivative code validate that the signer attribute in the JWT match the ARN of the Application Load Balancer that the service is configured to use. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34066 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in AVTECH IP cameras, DVRs, and NVRs due to the use of wget with --no-check-certificate in scripts like SyncCloudAccount.sh and SyncPermit.sh. This exposes HTTPS communications to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34063 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A cryptographic authentication bypass vulnerability exists in OneLogin AD Connector prior to 6.1.5 due to the exposure of a tenant’s SSO JWT signing key via the /api/adc/v4/configuration endpoint. An attacker in possession of the signing key can craft valid JWT tokens impersonating arbitrary users within a OneLogin tenant. The tokens allow authentication to the OneLogin SSO portal and all downstream applications federated via SAML or OIDC. This allows full unauthorized access across the victim’s SaaS environment. | ||||
| CVE-2024-46041 | 1 Iothaat | 1 Smart Plug Ih In 16a S | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| IoT Haat Smart Plug IH-IN-16A-S v5.16.1 is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4786 | 2026-04-15 | 2.8 Low | ||
| An improper validation vulnerability was reported in the Lenovo Tab K10 that could allow a specially crafted application to keep the device on. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47258 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| 2N Access Commander version 2.1 and prior is vulnerable in default settings to Man In The Middle attack due to not verifying certificates of 2N edge devices. 2N has currently released an updated version 3.3 of 2N Access Commander, with added Certificate Fingerprint Verification. Since version 2.2 of 2N Access Commander (released in February 2022) it is also possible to enforce TLS certificate validation.It is recommended that all customers update 2N Access Commander to the latest version and use one of two mentioned practices. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40702 | 1 Pingidentity | 1 Pingone Mfa Integration Kit | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| PingOne MFA Integration Kit contains a vulnerability where the skipMFA action can be configured such that user authentication does not require the second factor authentication from the user's existing registered devices. A threat actor might be able to exploit this vulnerability to authenticate as a target user if they have existing knowledge of the target user’s first-factor credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31802 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| DESIGNA ABACUS v.18 and before allows an attacker to bypass the payment process via a crafted QR code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40800 | 1 Siemens | 6 Comos, Nx, Simcenter 3d and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in COMOS V10.6 (All versions < V10.6.1), COMOS V10.6 (All versions < V10.6.1), NX V2412 (All versions < V2412.8700), NX V2506 (All versions < V2506.6000), Simcenter 3D (All versions < V2506.6000), Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2506.0002), Solid Edge SE2025 (All versions < V225.0 Update 10), Solid Edge SE2026 (All versions < V226.0 Update 1). The IAM client in affected products is missing server certificate validation while establishing TLS connections to the authorization server. This could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40801 | 1 Siemens | 8 Comos, Nx, Simcenter 3d and 5 more | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in COMOS V10.6 (All versions < V10.6.1), COMOS V10.6 (All versions < V10.6.1), JT Bi-Directional Translator for STEP (All versions), NX V2412 (All versions < V2412.8900 with Cloud Entitlement (bundled as NX X)), NX V2506 (All versions < V2506.6000 with Cloud Entitlement (bundled as NX X)), Simcenter 3D (All versions < V2506.6000 with Cloud Entitlement (bundled as Simcenter X Mechanical)), Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2506.0002 with Cloud Entitlement (bundled as Simcenter X Mechanical)), Simcenter Studio (All versions < V2506.0001), Simcenter System Architect (All versions < V2506.0001), Tecnomatix Plant Simulation (All versions < V2504.0007). The SALT SDK is missing server certificate validation while establishing TLS connections to the authorization server. This could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27440 | 2026-04-15 | 4.8 Medium | ||
| The Toyoko Inn official App for iOS versions prior to 1.13.0 and Toyoko Inn official App for Android versions prior 1.3.14 don't properly verify server certificates, which allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25906 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in WP Happy Coders Comments Like Dislike allows Functionality Bypass.This issue affects Comments Like Dislike: from n/a through 1.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-65083 | 1 Tinexta Infocert | 1 Gosign Desktop | 2026-04-15 | 3.2 Low |
| GoSign Desktop through 2.4.1 disables TLS certificate validation when configured to use a proxy server. This can be problematic if the GoSign Desktop user selects an arbitrary proxy server without consideration of whether outbound HTTPS connections from the proxy server to Internet servers succeed even for untrusted or invalid server certificates. In this scenario (which is outside of the product's design objectives), integrity protection could be bypassed. In typical cases of a proxy server for outbound HTTPS traffic from an enterprise, those connections would not succeed. (Admittedly, the usual expectation is that a client application is configured to trust an enterprise CA and does not set SSL_VERIFY_NONE.) Also, it is of course unsafe to place ~/.gosign in the home directory of an untrusted user and then have other users execute downloaded files. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22139 | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low | ||
| Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in Filipe Seabra WordPress Manutenção allows Functionality Bypass.This issue affects WordPress Manutenção: from n/a through 1.0.6. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71056 | 1 Szgcom | 1 Gcom Epon 1ge Onu | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| Improper session management in GCOM EPON 1GE ONU version C00R371V00B01 allows attackers to execute a session hijacking attack via spoofing the IP address of an authenticated user. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22030 | 1 Suse | 1 Rancher | 2026-04-15 | 8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher that can be exploited in narrow circumstances through a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. An attacker would need to have control of an expired domain or execute a DNS spoofing/hijacking attack against the domain to exploit this vulnerability. The targeted domain is the one used as the Rancher URL. | ||||