| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to the scp implementation being derived from 1983 rcp, the server chooses which files/directories are sent to the client. However, the scp client only performs cursory validation of the object name returned (only directory traversal attacks are prevented). A malicious scp server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can overwrite arbitrary files in the scp client target directory. If recursive operation (-r) is performed, the server can manipulate subdirectories as well (for example, to overwrite the .ssh/authorized_keys file). |
| In OpenSSH 7.9, due to accepting and displaying arbitrary stderr output from the server, a malicious server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can manipulate the client output, for example to use ANSI control codes to hide additional files being transferred. |
| An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to missing character encoding in the progress display, a malicious server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can employ crafted object names to manipulate the client output, e.g., by using ANSI control codes to hide additional files being transferred. This affects refresh_progress_meter() in progressmeter.c. |
| sqlite3Select in select.c in SQLite 3.30.1 allows a crash if a sub-select uses both DISTINCT and window functions, and also has certain ORDER BY usage. |
| SQLite 3.30.1 mishandles pExpr->y.pTab, as demonstrated by the TK_COLUMN case in sqlite3ExprCodeTarget in expr.c. |
| OpenSSH 7.7 through 7.9 and 8.x before 8.1, when compiled with an experimental key type, has a pre-authentication integer overflow if a client or server is configured to use a crafted XMSS key. This leads to memory corruption and local code execution because of an error in the XMSS key parsing algorithm. NOTE: the XMSS implementation is considered experimental in all released OpenSSH versions, and there is no supported way to enable it when building portable OpenSSH. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform server-side authorization checks for requests to modify the state of scheduled actions. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to retry, stop, or delete scheduled tasks without proper authorization. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to database queries used for subnet management. This could allow an authenticated attacker to read, modify, or delete subnet configurations, leading to unauthorized information disclosure and data manipulation. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to sensitive configuration items via specific database queries. This could allow an authenticated attacker to retrieve administrative credentials for various internal systems, leading to unauthorized information disclosure and privilege escalation. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly restrict access to various database queries, allowing users to retrieve system-wide information that is not intended for their privilege level. This could allow an authenticated attacker to gather sensitive information about the system's infrastructure, including details on all devices, substations, users, and scheduled activities. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize the filename of firmware files uploaded to the system. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in the Value field of notification conditions processed during the Notification Profile configuration. This could allow an authenticated attacker with specific privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in the Name and Value fields for custom file labels. This could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform authorization checks for device disconnection requests. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to disconnect active sessions of other users, including administrators, leading to a denial of service. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform server-side authorization checks for requests to schedule special operations. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to schedule unauthorized operations on devices. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in blueplanet 100 NX3 M8 (All versions), blueplanet 100 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 105 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 105 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 110 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 125 NX3 M10 (All versions), blueplanet 125 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 125 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 137 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 150 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 150 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 155 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 155 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 165 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 165 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 3.0 TL3-60.0 TL3 (All versions), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions < V6.1.4.9), blueplanet gridsave 110 TL3-S (All versions < V3.91), blueplanet gridsave 137 TL3-S (All versions < V3.91), blueplanet gridsave 92.0 TL3-S (All versions < V3.91). A CRC16-based algorithm for generating Technical Service credentials could allow an attacker to derive the credentials from the devices serial number and misuse them to gain unauthorized access. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in blueplanet 100 NX3 M8 (All versions), blueplanet 100 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 105 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 105 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 110 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 125 NX3 M10 (All versions), blueplanet 125 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 125 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 137 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 150 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 150 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 155 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 155 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 165 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 165 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 87.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet 92.0 TL3 GEN2 (All versions), blueplanet gridsave 110 TL3-S (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet gridsave 137 TL3-S (All versions < V3.92), blueplanet gridsave 92.0 TL3-S (All versions < V3.92). Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in KACO Meteor server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a local network. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05). Affected devices do not conduct certain validations when interacting with them. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to change time of the device, which means the device could behave differently. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05). Affected devices do not conduct certain validations when interacting with them. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to manipulate the devices IP address, which means the device would not be reachable. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 12/24RCE (6ED1052-1MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6ED1052-2MD08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCE (6ED1052-1FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 230RCEo (6ED1052-2FB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CE (6ED1052-1CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24CEo (6ED1052-2CC08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCE (6ED1052-1HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), LOGO! 24RCEo (6ED1052-2HB08-0BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCE (6AG1052-1MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 12/24RCEo (6AG1052-2MD08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCE (6AG1052-1FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 230RCEo (6AG1052-2FB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CE (6AG1052-1CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24CEo (6AG1052-2CC08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCE (6AG1052-1HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05), SIPLUS LOGO! 24RCEo (6AG1052-2HB08-7BA2) (All versions < V1.84.05). Affected devices do not properly validate the structure of TCP packets in several methods. This could allow an attacker to cause buffer overflows, get control over the instruction counter and run custom code. |
