Export limit exceeded: 420577 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (5991 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-51540 | 2 Eipstackgroup, Opener Project | 2 Opener, Opener | 2026-08-11 | 9.8 Critical |
| OpENer 2.3.0 (master branch up to commit 76b95cf) is vulnerable to a severe memory corruption issue caused by an integer underflow in the processing of connected explicit messages (SendUnitData). | ||||
| CVE-2026-64089 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-11 | 9.8 Critical |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: batman-adv: tt: fix negative last_changeset_len batadv_piv_tt::last_changeset_len len was declared as s16, but the field is never intended to hold a negative value. When a value greater than 32767 is assigned, it wraps to a negative signed integer. In batadv_send_my_tt_response(), last_changeset_len is temporarily widened to s32. The incorrectly negative s16 value propagates into the s32, causing batadv_tt_prepare_tvlv_local_data() to allocate a full sized buffer but populates only a small portion of it with the collected changeset. All remaining bits are kept uninitialized. Using an u16 avoids this type confusion and ensures that no (negative) sign extension is performed in batadv_send_my_tt_response(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-68270 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/sysfb: Avoid possible truncation with calculating visible size Calculating the visible size of the system framebuffer can result in truncation of the result. The calculation uses 32-bit arithmetics, which can overflow if the values for height and stride are large. Fix the issue by multiplying with mul_u32_u32(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-71393 | 1 Gnu | 1 Emacs | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| GNU Emacs for Android is vulnerable to an integer overflow in sfnt_read_name_table() in src/sfnt.c. The function computes an allocation size using a 32-bit length value from a TrueType font file without overflow checking. On 32-bit targets, a crafted font causes the calculation to wrap, resulting in an undersized heap allocation. A subsequent read() call writes beyond the buffer, causing a heap buffer overflow. An attacker can deliver a malicious font file via email, EWW (Emacs Web Wowser), or documents with custom faces, causing Emacs to load it. This can lead to heap memory corruption and potential code execution. This issue was fixed in commit d51a4722316efe0960994d371e1859099894d1ca | ||||
| CVE-2026-71392 | 1 Gnu | 1 Emacs | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| GNU Emacs for Android is vulnerable to an integer overflow in the sfnt_read_cmap_format_12() function in src/sfnt.c. When processing a crafted TrueType font file, an unguarded addition in the xmalloc allocation call wraps around on 32-bit builds, causing a heap buffer overflow write. An attacker can deliver a malicious font file via email, EWW (Emacs Web Wowser), or documents with custom faces, causing Emacs to load it. This results in heap memory corruption that can lead to code execution. This issue was fixed in commit c4e20777c26548722a37b03db93243e83a0d6188 | ||||
| CVE-2026-71391 | 1 Gnu | 1 Emacs | 2026-08-10 | 3.3 Low |
| GNU Emacs for Android contains an off-by-one error in the gvar table parser in src/sfnt.c. The shared-coordinate index boundary check in sfnt_vary_simple_glyph() and sfnt_vary_compound_glyph() uses a strict greater-than comparison instead of greater-than-or-equal, allowing a crafted TrueType variable font to bypass the check and trigger a heap-based out-of-bounds read via memcpy. An attacker can deliver a malicious font file via email, EWW (Emacs Web Wowser), or documents with custom faces, causing Emacs to load it. This exposes heap memory contents which can be later used to defeat ASLR. This issue was fixed in commit 95ab9ef627b212d74d321c5bbb5b56a1be7b9fbe | ||||
| CVE-2024-21391 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-08-10 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21377 | 1 Microsoft | 20 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 17 more | 2026-08-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| Windows DNS Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-34513 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909 and 5 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-34512 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 8 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21420 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-08-10 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2021-34510 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909 and 6 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21379 | 1 Microsoft | 4 365 Apps, Office, Office Long Term Servicing Channel and 1 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-35372 | 1 Microsoft | 6 365 Apps, Office, Office 2019 and 3 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Office Visio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21372 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-08-10 | 8.8 High |
| Windows OLE Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21352 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-08-10 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-21350 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more | 2026-08-10 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-35385 | 1 Microsoft | 19 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 16 more | 2026-08-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-35383 | 1 Microsoft | 19 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 16 more | 2026-08-10 | 7.5 High |
| Microsoft Message Queuing Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-36911 | 1 Microsoft | 20 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 17 more | 2026-08-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||