| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Incorrect access control in the setWiFiGuestCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to establish or weaken guest wireless access via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. |
| Incorrect access control in the UploadCustomModule function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to install a custom CGI module via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. |
| Vulnerabilities in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an authenticated low privilege operator user to access sensitive information. A successful exploit allows an attacker to access data beyond what is authorized by the user's existing privilege level, which could be used to potentially gain further access to network services supported by HPE Networking Fabric Composer. |
| Vulnerabilities exist in the authentication module that may improperly process malformed or truncated input. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by providing specially crafted input from a compromised or hostile authentication server. Successful exploitation could result in a Denial-of-Service or potential remote code execution with elevated privileges. |
| A flaw was found in Samba’s vfs_worm module. The module is intended to provide write-once, read-many (WORM) protections by preventing modification of files after a configurable grace period. Due to insufficient validation during rename operations, an authenticated user with write access to a share could overwrite a protected file by renaming a newly created file over the existing WORM-protected file. |
| A flaw was found in Samba’s handling of NTFS-style reparse points on shares configured with read only = yes. Due to missing SMB-layer access checks, authenticated users with underlying filesystem write permissions may create or delete reparse point metadata through SMB operations even on read-only exports. This could allow modification of SMB-visible file behavior, including converting files into symbolic links or other reparse point types. |
| Incorrect access control in the updatePriChannel function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to rescan and switch the primary mesh channel via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component. |
| Incorrect access control in the meshSlaveUpdate function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to start a firmware download or flash workflow on the slave device via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component. |
| Incorrect access control in the recvSlaveCloudCheckStatus function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to overwrite cloud-result tracking files via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component. |
| Incorrect access control in the remoteCloudUpdateCheck function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to restart the cloud update check workflow via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component. |
| Incorrect access control in the sendToMasterQosConfig function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to forward attacker-controlled QoS settings to the master via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component.. |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability in the ODBC App Server of Progress MarkLogic Server before 11.3.6 and 12.0.3 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass password verification and execute queries with the privileges of any named user known to the server, including administrators. |
| A flaw has been found in NousResearch hermes-agent 0.18.0. Affected by this issue is the function _sess_nowait of the file s71.py of the component Session Management. This manipulation of the argument session_id causes authorization bypass. The attack can be initiated remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. Prior to 0.32.0 and 1.16.0, Axios does not normalise IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. When NO_PROXY lists an IPv4 address such as 127.0.0.1 or 169.254.169.254, a request URL using the IPv4-mapped IPv6 form (::ffff:7f00:1, ::ffff:a9fe:a9fe) still routes through the configured proxy. Node.js resolves these addresses to the underlying IPv4 host, so the request reaches the internal service via the proxy rather than being blocked. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.32.0 and 1.16.0. |
| gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omitted the mandatory leading slash (e.g., `Service/Method` instead of `/Service/Method`). While the server successfully routed these requests to the correct handler, authorization interceptors (including the official `grpc/authz` package) evaluated the raw, non-canonical path string. Consequently, "deny" rules defined using canonical paths (starting with `/`) failed to match the incoming request, allowing it to bypass the policy if a fallback "allow" rule was present. This affects gRPC-Go servers that use path-based authorization interceptors, such as the official RBAC implementation in `google.golang.org/grpc/authz` or custom interceptors relying on `info.FullMethod` or `grpc.Method(ctx)`; AND that have a security policy contains specific "deny" rules for canonical paths but allows other requests by default (a fallback "allow" rule). The vulnerability is exploitable by an attacker who can send raw HTTP/2 frames with malformed `:path` headers directly to the gRPC server. The fix in version 1.79.3 ensures that any request with a `:path` that does not start with a leading slash is immediately rejected with a `codes.Unimplemented` error, preventing it from reaching authorization interceptors or handlers with a non-canonical path string. While upgrading is the most secure and recommended path, users can mitigate the vulnerability using one of the following methods: Use a validating interceptor (recommended mitigation); infrastructure-level normalization; and/or policy hardening. |
| The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.4.7 does not require authentication before processing its pending notification queue, allowing an unauthenticated user to force the dispatch of queued notifications and integration callbacks. |
| Privilege escalation in the WebDriver BiDi component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 155 and Thunderbird 155. |
| In Jenkins 2.579 and earlier, LTS 2.568.2 and earlier, the REST API and CLI endpoints for updating agent configuration do not prevent a submitted configuration from overwriting a different agent by specifying that agent's name in the submitted XML document, allowing attackers with Agent/Configure permission on one agent to take over a different agent, gaining control of its configuration and obtaining access to its inbound agent secret and environment variables. |
| A flaw was found in Lighthouse. A remote attacker, by compromising a spoke cluster, can exploit a vulnerability where the destination namespace for resource injection is derived from an attacker-controlled label or annotation on the broker object. This allows the attacker to inject unauthorized EndpointSlices and ServiceImports into any namespace on peer clusters, including critical system namespaces like kube-system and openshift-*. This could lead to privilege escalation or other forms of system compromise within the cluster. |
| A flaw was found in the submariner-operator component. The `submariner-k8s-broker-cluster` Role, which is assigned to joined clusters, possesses excessive permissions. This allows a compromised cluster to alter network configurations, specifically by overwriting other clusters' endpoint information. Consequently, an attacker can redirect inter-cluster tunnel traffic, enabling a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack across the entire cluster mesh. |
