| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| In SunOS or Solaris, a remote user could connect from an FTP server's data port to an rlogin server on a host that trusts the FTP server, allowing remote command execution. |
| MAILsweeper for SMTP 4.3 allows remote attackers to bypass virus protection via a mail message with a malformed zip attachment, as exploited by certain MIMAIL virus variants. |
| Solaris rpcbind listens on a high numbered UDP port, which may not be filtered since the standard port number is 111. |
| Denial of service by sending forged ICMP unreachable packets. |
| Guessable magic cookies in X Windows allows remote attackers to execute commands, e.g. through xterm. |
| HP Remote Watch allows a remote user to gain root access. |
| Denial of service in Slmail v2.5 through the POP3 port. |
| The default configuration of the DNS Server service on Windows Server 2003 and Windows 2000, and the Microsoft DNS Server service on Windows NT 4.0, allows recursive queries and provides additional delegation information to arbitrary IP addresses, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (traffic amplification) via DNS queries with spoofed source IP addresses. |
| WordPress 2.0.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a direct request to (1) default-filters.php, (2) template-loader.php, (3) rss-functions.php, (4) locale.php, (5) wp-db.php, and (6) kses.php in the wp-includes/ directory; and (7) edit-form-advanced.php, (8) admin-functions.php, (9) edit-link-form.php, (10) edit-page-form.php, (11) admin-footer.php, and (12) menu.php in the wp-admin directory; and possibly (13) list directory contents of the wp-includes directory. NOTE: the vars.php, edit-form.php, wp-settings.php, and edit-form-comment.php vectors are already covered by CVE-2005-4463. The menu-header.php vector is already covered by CVE-2005-2110. Other vectors might be covered by CVE-2005-1688. NOTE: if the typical installation of WordPress does not list any site-specific files to wp-includes, then vector [13] is not an exposure. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the "post comment" functionality of WordPress 2.0.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) name, (2) website, and (3) comment parameters. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in inc_header.php in EJ3 TOPo 2.2.178 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the gTopNombre parameter. |
| PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in includes/joomla.php in Joomla! 1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the includepath parameter. |
| mysqlbug in MySQL allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on the failed-mysql-bugreport temporary file. |
| Apache 2.0 before 2.0.44 on Windows platforms allows remote attackers to obtain certain files via an HTTP request that ends in certain illegal characters such as ">", which causes a different filename to be processed and served. |
| Symantec Java! JIT (Just-In-Time) Compiler for Netscape Communicator 4.0 through 4.8 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Java commands via an applet that uses a jump call, which is not correctly compiled by the JIT compiler. |
| Splatt Forum 3.0 to 3.2 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via unknown vectors. |
| Buffer overflow in Essentia Web Server 2.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service, and possibly execute arbitrary code, via a long URL. |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in pm.php in DeluxeBB 1.07 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) subject or (2) to parameters. |
| Apache 2 before 2.0.47, and certain versions of mod_ssl for Apache 1.3, do not properly handle "certain sequences of per-directory renegotiations and the SSLCipherSuite directive being used to upgrade from a weak ciphersuite to a strong one," which could cause Apache to use the weak ciphersuite. |
| The prefork MPM in Apache 2 before 2.0.47 does not properly handle certain errors from accept, which could lead to a denial of service. |