Export limit exceeded: 11023 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11023 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-42937 | 1 Sap | 1 Sapsprint | 2026-11-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| SAP Print Service (SAPSprint) performs insufficient validation of path information provided by users. An unauthenticated attacker could traverse to the parent directory and over-write system files causing high impact on confidentiality integrity and availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-39467 | 3 Mikado-themes, Qodeinteractive, Wordpress | 3 Wanderland, Wanderland, Wordpress | 2026-11-03 | 8.1 High |
| Path Traversal: '.../...//' vulnerability in Mikado-Themes Wanderland wanderland allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Wanderland: from n/a through <= 1.7.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85243 | 1 Apache | 2 Apache Camel, Camel | 2026-11-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in Apache Camel Crypto PGP component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. unmarshal() verified the modification detection code only when the message was an OpenPGP symmetrically encrypted integrity protected data packet. The older symmetrically encrypted data packet carries no such code, and OpenPGP's CFB mode is malleable without one, so a message using that packet skipped the check altogether. The packet type is chosen by whoever produced the message, which left the sender - or anyone able to rewrite the message in transit - deciding whether the integrity check applied at all. The existing integrity option governs marshalling only and had no decrypt-side counterpart, so a deployment could not require integrity protection on the messages it accepted. Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. Users on the 4.22.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. A requireIntegrityProtection option, defaulting to true, now rejects a message that is not integrity protected. Note that signatureVerificationOption still defaults to optional, so a message carrying no signature is accepted; the two options together are what give a decrypted message authenticity and not only confidentiality. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, reject messages that do not use the integrity protected packet before they reach the data format. Routes that must interoperate with a sender still emitting the legacy packet should set requireIntegrityProtection=false after upgrading, and treat the decrypted content as unauthenticated. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116838 | 1 Ubiquiti | 1 Airmax M | 2026-11-03 | 8.8 High |
| A malicious actor who lures an authenticated user to a malicious page could exploit a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability found in airMAX M devices to execute a Command Injection on the device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101447 | 1 Oracle | 1 Siebel Crm Development | 2026-11-03 | 7.1 High |
| Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Development product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Workflow). Supported versions that are affected are 25.12-26.9. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM Development. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Siebel CRM Development. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101495 | 1 Oracle | 1 Siebel Crm Development | 2026-11-03 | 8.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Development product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Siebel Approval Manager). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM Development. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Siebel CRM Development. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101492 | 1 Oracle | 1 Siebel Crm Integration | 2026-11-03 | 4.7 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Integration product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Open Integration). Supported versions that are affected are 25.12-26.9. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel CRM Integration. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Siebel CRM Integration, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Siebel CRM Integration accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Siebel CRM Integration accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-101451 | 1 Oracle | 1 Siebel Life Sciences | 2026-11-03 | 8.7 High |
| Vulnerability in the Siebel Life Sciences product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Web UI). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel Life Sciences. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Siebel Life Sciences, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Siebel Life Sciences accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Siebel Life Sciences accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-118782 | 1 Digitalbazaar | 1 Forge | 2026-11-03 | 7.5 High |
| Forge (also called node-forge) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. Prior to 1.4.1, node-forge accepted a PKCS#12 MAC or PKCS#12 password-based encryption iteration count of zero or less. pki.pbe.generatePkcs12Key() then returned a constant key independent of the password and salt, allowing crafted PKCS#12 input processed by forge.pkcs12.pkcs12FromAsn1() to bypass password-based integrity checks. Predictable encryption keys and IVs also affected PKCS#12 PBE using pbeWithSHAAnd3-KeyTripleDES-CBC or pbewithSHAAnd40BitRC2-CBC, including shrouded key bags, encrypted SafeContents, and PKCS#8 ENCRYPTED PRIVATE KEY input processed independently by forge.pki.decryptPrivateKeyInfo(). PBES2/PBKDF2-encrypted content is unaffected. This issue is fixed in version 1.4.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116204 | 1 Yeswiki | 1 Yeswiki | 2026-11-03 | 8.1 High |
| YesWiki before 4.7.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the despam action (tools/security/actions/despam.php) that lets unauthenticated attackers delete or restore pages through an administrator's session. Attackers can plant an auto-submitting raw HTML form on a wiki page, so an administrator who views it posts clean, suppr[], or rev[] parameters that delete PagePrincipale, configuration pages, or overwrite current content. | ||||
| CVE-2026-120206 | 1 Thelia | 4 Thelia, Thelia Back-office Default Template, Thelia Back-office Default Twig Template and 1 more | 2026-11-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| Thelia before 3.2.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the back office that allows attackers to forge administrative actions because per-session CSRF tokens leak via URL query strings. Attackers can reuse leaked tokens or target the unprotected setToggleVisibilityAction and updatePositionAction to make logged-in administrators delete, hide or reorder catalogue and configuration objects. | ||||
| CVE-2026-120207 | 1 Thelia | 1 Thelia Page Module | 2026-11-03 | 7.1 High |
| Thelia Page Module before 2.0.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to delete page tags, documents and images by abusing back-office delete routes lacking CSRF tokens and permission checks. Attackers can lure a logged-in administrator into navigating to crafted GET requests that walk sequential ids, removing TheliaLibrary images, their files and variants across pages, products and categories. | ||||
| CVE-2026-120249 | 1 Thelia | 1 Thelia Back-office Default Twig Template | 2026-11-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Thelia Back-office Default Twig Template before 1.1.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the /admin/product/combinations/update and /admin/product/default-price/update routes, which accept GET requests without anti-CSRF token checks. Attackers can lure a logged-in administrator into following a crafted link to rewrite product combination prices, stock, weight, EAN and sale flags, zeroing omitted prices. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103420 | 1 Php-web-design.com | 1 Stageit Extension For Joomla | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| Joomla Extension - php-web-design.com - CSRF for various actions in StageIt 1.0-5.7.5, 6.0-6.3.5 | ||||
| CVE-2026-116052 | 2 Linkstack, Linkstackorg | 2 Linkstack, Linkstack | 2026-11-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| A security flaw has been discovered in LinkStackOrg LinkStack up to 4.8.8. The affected element is an unknown function. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119426 | 1 Phpmyadmin | 1 Phpmyadmin | 2026-11-03 | 7.5 High |
| phpMyAdmin through 5.2.3 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL by bypassing CSRF token checks on non-AJAX POST requests. Attackers can lure authenticated victims into submitting cross-site POSTs carrying sql_query to /sql or /database/sql, running SQL with the victim's database privileges under http or config authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121451 | 2026-11-03 | 8.8 High | ||
| AB Download Manager before 1.11.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its unauthenticated browser-integration API that allows remote attackers to write attacker-chosen files to arbitrary paths. A malicious web page can send a text/plain request to /start-headless-download with crafted folder and name values, placing payloads in startup folders for code execution on next login. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97718 | 1 Absolute | 1 Secure Access | 2026-11-03 | N/A |
| CVE-2026-97718 Is a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in version 14.60 of the Secure Access server. Because of a bypassed security control, an attacker can cause an admin to create an account under their control. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118266 | 1 Labstack | 1 Echo | 2026-11-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| Echo is a Go web framework. Prior to 4.16.0 and 5.4.0, Echo's MethodOverride middleware accepts a safe HTTP method as the override target for a POST request. When MethodOverride is registered before CSRF in the post-routing middleware chain, route selection retains the original state-changing POST handler but the override changes the method before CSRF evaluates it, causing both token validation and Sec-Fetch-Site checks to be skipped. A cross-site exploit requires an authenticated victim and an override value that a browser-submitted request can control, such as the form getter used by the advisory reproducer; the default X-HTTP-Method-Override header getter is not settable by a cross-site form. This issue is fixed in 4.16.0 and 5.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116794 | 1 Eugeny | 1 Russh | 2026-11-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| russh is a Rust SSH client and server library that includes an SSH agent protocol implementation. From 0.50.0-beta.12 until 0.65.0, the agent server's Connection::try_sign path in russh/src/keys/agent/server.rs recognizes SSH_AGENT_CONSTRAIN_CONFIRM but returns a hard-coded successful result instead of calling Agent::confirm. In applications that override Agent::confirm to require user approval or another policy check, a process that can reach the agent socket, including the remote side of a forwarded agent, can use a key added through ssh-add -c without that check and can authenticate or sign data as the user while the key remains loaded. The separate Agent::confirm_request hook still runs for every signing request, so checks implemented there remain effective, and implementations that retain the default always-successful Agent::confirm do not lose an approval check through this regression. This issue is fixed in version 0.65.0. | ||||