Export limit exceeded: 421368 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 18108 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 54484 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11443 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11059 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11059 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-20460 | 1 Epson | 1 Xp-255 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered on Epson Expression Home XP255 20.08.FM10I8 devices. POST requests don't require (anti-)CSRF tokens or other mechanisms for validating that the request is from a legitimate source. In addition, CSRF attacks can be used to send text directly to the RAW printer interface. For example, an attack could deliver a worrisome printout to an end user. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47100 | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7211-1BE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/DC (6ES7211-1AE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1211C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7211-1HE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1BE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6ES7212-1AE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1HE40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7212-1AF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1212FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7212-1HF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1BG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC (6ES7214-1AG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1HG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7214-1AF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7214-1HF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C AC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1BG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DC (6ES7215-1AG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1HG40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DC (6ES7215-1AF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/Rly (6ES7215-1HF40-0XB0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU 1217C DC/DC/DC (6ES7217-1AG40-0XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1BE40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1BE40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1HE40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1212-1HE40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6AG1212-1AE40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC (6AG1212-1AE40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1212C DC/DC/DC RAIL (6AG2212-1AE40-1XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1BG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214C DC/DC/DC RAIL (6AG2214-1AG40-1XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/DC (6AG1214-1AF40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1214FC DC/DC/RLY (6AG1214-1HF40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 AC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1BG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-2XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-4XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215 DC/DC/RLY (6AG1215-1HG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215C DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AG40-5XB0), SIPLUS S7-1200 CPU 1215FC DC/DC/DC (6AG1215-1AF40-5XB0). The web interface of the affected devices is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to change the CPU mode by tricking a legitimate and authenticated user with sufficient permissions on the target CPU to click on a malicious link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13008 | 2 M-files, M-files Corporation | 3 M-files Server, Server, M-files Server | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in M-Files Server before versions 25.12.15491.7, 25.8 LTS SR3, 25.2 LTS SR3 and 24.8 LTS SR5 allows an authenticated attacker using M-Files Web to capture session tokens of other active users. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64253 | 1 Wordpress | 2 Health Check & Troubleshooting, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| Path Traversal: '.../...//' vulnerability in WordPress.org Health Check & Troubleshooting health-check allows Path Traversal.This issue affects Health Check & Troubleshooting: from n/a through <= 1.7.1. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25127 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| SOCA Access Control System 180612 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that submit forged requests to create admin accounts by tricking logged-in users into visiting a malicious site. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26816 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in Intrexx Portal Server 12.0.2 and earlier which was classified as problematic potentially allows users with particular permissions under certain conditions to see potentially sensitive data from a different user context. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58999 | 2 Loopus, Wordpress | 2 Wp Attractive Donations System, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in loopus WP Attractive Donations System - Easy Stripe & Paypal donations WP_AttractiveDonationsSystem allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Attractive Donations System - Easy Stripe & Paypal donations: from n/a through <= 1.25. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24289 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the UCRM Client Signup Plugin (v1.3.4 and earlier) could allow privilege escalation if an Administrator is tricked into visiting a crafted malicious page. The plugin is disabled by default. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36513 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in surveillance cameras provided by i-PRO Co., Ltd.. If a user views a crafted page while logged in to the affected product, unintended operations may be performed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10317 | 1 Opensolution | 1 Quick.cart | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Quick.Cart is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in product creation functionality. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the admin, will automatically send a POST request creating a malicious product with content defined by the attacker. This software does not implement any protection against this type of attack. All forms available in this software are potentially vulnerable. The vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn't respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Only version 6.7 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested and might also be vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67626 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Angel Costa WP SEO Search wp-seo-search allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP SEO Search: from n/a through <= 1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11444 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The CLUEVO LMS, E-Learning Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.13.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cluevo_render_module_ui() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete modules via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25133 | 1 Synaccess | 1 Netbooter Np-0801du | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Synaccess netBooter NP-0801DU 7.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages with hidden form submissions to add admin users by tricking authenticated administrators into loading a malicious page. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23081 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - DataTransfer Extension allows Cross Site Request Forgery, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Mediawiki - DataTransfer Extension: from 1.39.X before 1.39.11, from 1.41.X before 1.41.3, from 1.42.X before 1.42.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4956 | 2 Aa-team, Wordpress | 2 Pro Bulk Watermark Plugin, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Path Traversal: '.../...//' vulnerability in AA-Team Pro Bulk Watermark Plugin for WordPress allows Path Traversal.This issue affects Pro Bulk Watermark Plugin for WordPress: from n/a through 2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40685 | 1 Ibm | 1 Operations Analytics - Log Analysis | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Operations Analytics – Log Analysis versions 1.3.5.0 through 1.3.8.3 and IBM SmartCloud Analytics – Log Analysis are vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could allow an attacker to trick a trusted user into performing unauthorized actions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34050 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web interface of AVTECH IP camera, DVR, and NVR devices. An attacker can craft malicious requests that, when executed in the context of an authenticated user’s browser session, allow unauthorized changes to the device configuration without user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13444 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The wp-greet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34133 | 1 Wimi Teamwork | 1 Wimi Teamwork | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Wimi Teamwork versions prior to 7.38.17 contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in its API. The API accepts any authenticated request that contains a JSON field named 'csrf_token' without validating the field’s value; only the presence of the field is checked. An attacker can craft a cross-site request that causes a logged-in victim’s browser to submit a JSON POST containing an arbitrary or empty 'csrf_token', and the API will execute the request with the victim’s privileges. Successful exploitation can allow an attacker to perform privileged actions as the victim potentially resulting in account takeover, privilege escalation, or service disruption. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48930 | 1 Secp256k1-node Project | 1 Secp256k1-node | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| secp256k1-node is a Node.js binding for an Optimized C library for EC operations on curve secp256k1. In `elliptic`-based version, `loadUncompressedPublicKey` has a check that the public key is on the curve. Prior to versions 5.0.1, 4.0.4, and 3.8.1, however, `loadCompressedPublicKey` is missing that check. That allows the attacker to use public keys on low-cardinality curves to extract enough information to fully restore the private key from as little as 11 ECDH sessions, and very cheaply on compute power. Other operations on public keys are also affected, including e.g. `publicKeyVerify()` incorrectly returning `true` on those invalid keys, and e.g. `publicKeyTweakMul()` also returning predictable outcomes allowing to restore the tweak. Versions 5.0.1, 4.0.4, and 3.8.1 contain a fix for the issue. | ||||