Export limit exceeded: 420380 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (420380 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-93567 | 2 Io.netty, Redhat | 24 Netty-codec-http2, Amq Broker, Apache Camel Quarkus and 21 more | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Netty's HTTP/2 codec. When converting HTTP/1 CONNECT requests to HTTP/2, the component incorrectly uses the Host header instead of the CONNECT authority-form request-target for the tunnel authority. A remote attacker can exploit this by supplying a different Host header, leading to a malformed HTTP/2 CONNECT request. This can bypass security controls such as tunnel allow-lists or egress policies, resulting in integrity loss. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93565 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 23 Red Hat Amq Broker 7, Amq Broker, Amq Clients and 20 more | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Netty RtspDecoder. The `RtspMethods.valueOf()` function incorrectly strips trailing control bytes from method tokens in Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) requests. A remote attacker can exploit this by sending a specially crafted RTSP request, leading to method-token smuggling. This vulnerability allows an attacker to bypass method-based access controls and can also be used to launder malicious requests through Netty-based RTSP proxies, making them appear legitimate to backend systems. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93564 | 1 Redhat | 20 Amq Broker, Amq Broker 7, Apache Camel Quarkus and 17 more | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Netty. A reference-count leak in the HAProxy PROXY-v2 message decoder allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to send specially crafted PROXY-protocol v2 headers. This can lead to memory exhaustion, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93558 | 2 Io.netty, Redhat | 24 Netty-codec-http, Amq Broker, Amq Broker 7 and 21 more | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Netty's WebSocketServerExtensionHandler. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by using HTTP/1.1 pipelining to send requests faster than the application can respond. This leads to an unbounded growth of a per-connection queue, consuming excessive memory. Eventually, this can cause the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) to exhaust its heap, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the affected server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93491 | 2 Io.netty, Redhat | 23 Netty-codec-http, Amq Broker, Amq Broker 7 and 20 more | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Netty's HttpServerCodec. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by pipelining HTTP/1.1 requests on a single connection and withholding reads. This action causes the methodOverflowQueue to grow without limit, leading to unbounded heap memory consumption and a denial of service due to memory exhaustion. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93488 | 2 Io.netty, Redhat | 23 Netty-codec-http, Amq Broker, Amq Clients and 20 more | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Netty. SpdySessionHandler accepts an unlimited number of concurrent remote-initiated streams because localConcurrentStreams defaults to Integer.MAX_VALUE and the handler provides no API to change it. A remote peer can open a SPDY connection and send a large number of SYN_STREAM frames with FLAG_FIN=0, causing unbounded heap and direct memory allocation that can lead to JVM OutOfMemoryError and a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92857 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 5 Red Hat Build Of Keycloak 26.4, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak and 2 more | 2026-11-06 | 8.1 High |
| Keycloak provides a Dynamic Client Registration feature that allows users with specific tokens to register their own applications. A flaw in how Keycloak validates these registration requests allows an attacker to create a malicious application that forges identity information. By mapping their own user profile details to protected fields like the user ID (sub) or intended audience (aud), an attacker can generate signed security tokens that make them appear to be a different user. This could allow an attacker to impersonate other users or gain unauthorized access to services that rely on these tokens for identity verification. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92855 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 5 Red Hat Build Of Keycloak 26.4, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak and 2 more | 2026-11-06 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in the SAML identity broker component of Keycloak, which is used to delegate authentication to external identity providers. The issue occurs because the broker fails to verify that a user actually possesses the private key associated with a holder-of-key assertion. An attacker who intercepts a victim signed assertion can replay it to gain unauthorized access and impersonate the victim without needing their private key. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66294 | 1 Qcam | 1 Saxy | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| XML injection in the Saxy XML encoder. Saxy.Encoder.cdata/1 serializes a {:cdata, characters} node by wrapping the supplied characters between <![CDATA[ and ]]> and passing the payload through byte for byte. The encoder's character-data and attribute-value paths escape the XML metacharacters <, >, &, ", and ', but the CDATA path applies no neutralization at all. XML provides no character escaping mechanism inside a CDATA section, so the only correct way to represent a ]]> substring is to split the section and rejoin it as ]]]]><![CDATA[>. Saxy neither performs that split nor rejects the substring. An application that renders untrusted text as CDATA, by building the node with Saxy.XML.cdata/1 and serializing it with Saxy.encode!/2 or Saxy.encode_to_iodata!/2, therefore lets an attacker terminate the section at a position of their choosing. Everything supplied after the ]]> is emitted outside any CDATA context and is parsed as markup, so a single attacker-controlled text field becomes attacker-controlled document structure: arbitrary sibling elements and attributes that the application never built. Downstream consumers of the serialized document accept the injected markup as genuine. Services that generate SOAP envelopes, RSS or Atom feeds, sitemaps, SVG, or XML exports from user-supplied content can have trusted fields forged or overridden. Applications that never place untrusted text in a CDATA node are not affected. This issue affects saxy: from 0.7.0 before 1.7.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66295 | 1 Qcam | 1 Saxy | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| Saxy's XML encoder writes the target and the content of a processing instruction into the output document verbatim, without validation or escaping. The encoder builds the construct by concatenating both fields between <? and ?>, so neither field is checked against the constraints the XML specification places on it. Because ?> terminates a processing instruction, a target or content value containing that sequence closes the construct at a position the attacker chooses. Everything the attacker writes after it is emitted as ordinary markup at document level, which allows arbitrary elements, attributes, and further processing instructions to be injected into the serialized document. Appending a matching <? keeps the encoder's own terminator well-formed, so the result still parses and the injection is silent rather than a visible corruption. The target is additionally unconstrained by the XML Name production, which permits injection before the remainder of the processing instruction. The result is XML injection into a serialized document: the tree the application asks Saxy to encode and the tree a downstream parser reads back are no longer the same. Character data, attribute values, and comments are all escaped by the encoder, so processing instructions are the one construct that passes user bytes through untouched. Since Saxy.XML.processing_instruction/2 is a documented public builder, an application inherits the flaw without misusing the API. The consequences depend on what consumes the XML: forged records in a feed or export read by another system, injected stylesheet or rendering directives, or active content where the output is served to a browser as XML or SVG. This issue affects saxy: from 0.7.0 before 1.7.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66293 | 1 Qcam | 1 Saxy | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| XML injection in the encoder of Saxy. Saxy.Encoder does not neutralize the -- sequence in XML comment content: escape_comment/2 returns the comment binary unchanged in every clause and only appends a space when the comment ends in a single -, so neither an interior -- nor a full --> is escaped or rejected before the encoder wraps the content in the <!-- and --> delimiters. When an application serializes attacker-controlled text as a comment, through Saxy.XML.comment/1 or a raw {:comment, text} simple form child, the attacker can close the comment early with --> and inject arbitrary sibling markup into the serialized document. A downstream parser then sees elements, attributes, and text that the application never built. Where the document is rendered as HTML or SVG, the injected markup executes as stored cross-site scripting; where it is consumed by another XML processor, the attacker can forge data that the producing application never emitted. Documents that Saxy only parses are not a vector. This issue affects saxy: from 0.7.0 before 1.7.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121821 | 1 Ly Corporation | 1 Armeria | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| A vulnerability has been identified in armeria versions 0.84.0 through 1.42.0, where any-origin CORS policies do not enforce configured path restrictions, allowing an attacker-controlled website visited by an authenticated victim to read sensitive responses from excluded paths when credentials are enabled and the victim's browser sends authentication credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121822 | 1 Ly Corporation | 1 Armeria | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| A vulnerability has been identified in armeria versions 0.80.0 through 1.42.0, where attackers who control file names can cause stored cross-site scripting (XSS) when directory listing is enabled and a user views the listing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121823 | 1 Ly Corporation | 1 Armeria | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| A vulnerability has been identified in armeria versions prior to 1.43.0, where inconsistent request path normalization can allow unauthenticated attackers to bypass path-based access controls and access protected resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119472 | 2 Davidanderson, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Redux Framework, Redux Framework | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in David Anderson Redux Framework redux-framework allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Redux Framework: from n/a through 4.5.16. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110291 | 2 Iqonicdesign, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Graphina – Charts And Graphs For Elementor, Graphina | 2026-11-06 | 7.2 High |
| The Graphina – Charts and Graphs For Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'iq_tree_chart_node_font_family (and any text control serialized into chart_data['settings'])' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.13 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Elementor's Utils::kses_post_deep() does not strip the attack payload on save because the payload contains no disallowed HTML tags — only a single quote and an event-handler fragment — allowing the malicious value to survive persistence. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115831 | 2026-11-06 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The VOD Infomaniak plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.15. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to initiate unauthorized video imports using the site owner's Infomaniak API credentials, consume the site owner's VOD account quota, and insert arbitrary rows into the wp_vod_upload table causing public shortcodes to resolve to attacker-chosen video content. This action is explicitly reserved for Contributor-level and above by the plugin's own role-rights system, meaning subscriber access is intentionally forbidden by design — the AJAX handler simply omits the enforcement. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97642 | 2026-11-06 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| The Wp Parsidate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the calendar Gutenberg block's 'theme' attribute in versions up to, and including, 6.4. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on the block attribute value which is concatenated directly into an HTML class attribute in the printCalendar() function without esc_attr(). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-120659 | 2026-11-06 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Redirection for Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.14 This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to write arbitrary post meta values to newly created lead posts and copy arbitrary server-side files with allowed MIME-type extensions into the plugin's uploads directory. Exploitation requires a published Contact Form 7 form configured with the Save Entry (Save Lead) action enabled on the target site. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109977 | 2026-11-06 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| The YaySMTP – WP Mail SMTP with Email Logs, Tracking & Reports plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based SQL Injection via the 'params[searchKey]' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.8 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. | ||||