Export limit exceeded: 26532 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (26532 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-6552 | 1 Tms-outsource | 1 Amelia | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar – Amelia plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to the plugin utilizing Symfony and leaving display_errors on within test files. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6550 | 1 Nikunj | 1 Gravity Forms Multiple Form Instances | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Gravity Forms: Multiple Form Instances plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to the plugin leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6549 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Admin Post Navigation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6548 | 2 Coffee2code, Wordpress | 2 Add Admin Javascript, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Add Admin JavaScript plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.0. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6547 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Add Admin CSS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6546 | 2 Coffee2code, Wordpress | 2 One Click Close Comments, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The One Click Close Comments plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.1. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6562 | 1 Servit | 1 Affiliate-toolkit | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The affiliate-toolkit – WordPress Affiliate Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.5. This is due display_errors being set to true . This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6545 | 1 Coffee2code | 1 Admin Trim Interface | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Admin Trim Interface plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.1. This is due to the plugin utilizing bootstrap and leaving test files with display_errors on. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6506 | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High | ||
| Information exposure vulnerability in the MRW plugin, in its 5.4.3 version, affecting the "mrw_log" functionality. This vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to obtain other customers' order information and access sensitive information such as name and phone number. This vulnerability also allows an attacker to create or overwrite shipping labels. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5880 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Hide My Site plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.2 due to the plugin not restricting access to the REST API when password protection is enabled. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to gain unauthorized access to the site. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56509 | 1 Dgtlmoon | 1 Changedetection.io | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| changedetection.io is a free open source web page change detection, website watcher, restock monitor and notification service. Improper input validation in the application can allow attackers to perform local file read (LFR) or path traversal attacks. These vulnerabilities occur when user input is used to construct file paths without adequate sanitization or validation. For example, using file:../../../etc/passwd or file: ///etc/passwd can bypass weak validations and allow unauthorized access to sensitive files. Even though this has been addressed in previous patch, it is still insufficient. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.48.05. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8304 | 2 Checkpoint, Microsoft | 2 Identity Agent, Windows | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| An authenticated local user can obtain information that allows claiming security policy rules of another user due to sensitive information being accessible in the Windows Registry keys for Check Point Identity Agent running on a Terminal Server. | ||||
| CVE-2024-55655 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| sigstore-python is a Python tool for generating and verifying Sigstore signatures. Versions of sigstore-python newer than 2.0.0 but prior to 3.6.0 perform insufficient validation of the "integration time" present in "v2" and "v3" bundles during the verification flow: the "integration time" is verified *if* a source of signed time (such as an inclusion promise) is present, but is otherwise trusted if no source of signed time is present. This does not affect "v1" bundles, as the "v1" bundle format always requires an inclusion promise. Sigstore uses signed time to support verification of signatures made against short-lived signing keys. The impact and severity of this weakness is *low*, as Sigstore contains multiple other enforcing components that prevent an attacker who modifies the integration timestamp within a bundle from impersonating a valid signature. In particular, an attacker who modifies the integration timestamp can induce a Denial of Service, but in no different manner than already possible with bundle access (e.g. modifying the signature itself such that it fails to verify). Separately, an attacker could upload a *new* entry to the transparency service, and substitute their new entry's time. However, this would still be rejected at validation time, as the new entry's (valid) signed time would be outside the validity window of the original signing certificate and would nonetheless render the attacker auditable. | ||||
| CVE-2024-55272 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| An issue in Brainasoft Braina v2.8 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the chat window function. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54140 | 1 Sigstore | 1 Sigstore-java | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| sigstore-java is a sigstore java client for interacting with sigstore infrastructure. sigstore-java has insufficient verification for a situation where a bundle provides a invalid signature for a checkpoint. This bug impacts clients using any variation of KeylessVerifier.verify(). Currently checkpoints are only used to ensure the root hash of an inclusion proof was provided by the log in question. Failing to validate that means a bundle may provide an inclusion proof that doesn't actually correspond to the log in question. This may eventually lead a monitor/witness being unable to detect when a compromised logs are providing different views of themselves to different clients. There are other mechanisms right now that mitigate this, such as the signed entry timestamp. Sigstore-java currently requires a valid signed entry timestamp. By correctly verifying the signed entry timestamp we can make certain assertions about the log signing the log entry (like the log was aware of the artifact signing event and signed it). Therefore the impact on clients that are not monitors/witnesses is very low. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54134 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A publish-access account was compromised for `@solana/web3.js`, a JavaScript library that is commonly used by Solana dapps. This allowed an attacker to publish unauthorized and malicious packages that were modified, allowing them to steal private key material and drain funds from dapps, like bots, that handle private keys directly. This issue should not affect non-custodial wallets, as they generally do not expose private keys during transactions. This is not an issue with the Solana protocol itself, but with a specific JavaScript client library and only appears to affect projects that directly handle private keys and that updated within the window of 3:20pm UTC and 8:25pm UTC on Tuesday, December 3, 2024. These two unauthorized versions (1.95.6 and 1.95.7) were caught within hours and have since been unpublished. All Solana app developers should upgrade to version 1.95.8. Developers that suspect they might be compromised should rotate any suspect authority keys, including multisigs, program authorities, server keypairs, and so on. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53243 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk Enterprise, Splunk Secure Gateway | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.3.2, 9.2.4, and 9.1.7 and versions below 3.2.462, 3.7.18, and 3.8.5 of the Splunk Secure Gateway app on Splunk Cloud Platform, a low-privileged user that does not hold the “admin“ or “power“ Splunk roles could see alert search query responses using Splunk Secure Gateway App Key Value Store (KVstore) collections endpoints due to improper access control. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29781 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Bare Metal Operator (BMO) implements a Kubernetes API for managing bare metal hosts in Metal3. Baremetal Operator enables users to load Secret from arbitrary namespaces upon deployment of the namespace scoped Custom Resource `BMCEventSubscription`. Prior to versions 0.8.1 and 0.9.1, an adversary Kubernetes account with only namespace level roles (e.g. a tenant controlling a namespace) may create a `BMCEventSubscription` in his authorized namespace and then load Secrets from his unauthorized namespaces to his authorized namespace via the Baremetal Operator, causing Secret Leakage. The patch makes BMO refuse to read Secrets from other namespace than where the corresponding BMH resource is. The patch does not change the `BMCEventSubscription` API in BMO, but stricter validation will fail the request at admission time. It will also prevent the controller reading such Secrets, in case the BMCES CR has already been deployed. The issue exists for all versions of BMO, and is patched in BMO releases v0.9.1 and v0.8.1. Prior upgrading to patched BMO version, duplicate any existing Secret pointed to by `BMCEventSubscription`'s `httpHeadersRef` to the same namespace where the corresponding BMH exists. After upgrade, remove the old Secrets. As a workaround, the operator can configure BMO RBAC to be namespace scoped, instead of cluster scoped, to prevent BMO from accessing Secrets from other namespaces, and/or use `WATCH_NAMESPACE` configuration option to limit BMO to single namespace. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51163 | 1 Vegam Solutions | 1 Vegam 4i | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A Local File Inclusion vulnerability in Vegam Solutions Vegam 4i versions 6.3.47.0 and earlier allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information through the print label function. Specifically, the filePathList parameter is susceptible to LFI, enabling a malicious user to include files from the web server, such as web.config or /etc/host, leading to the disclosure of sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5096 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Hipcam Device up to 20240511. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /log/wifi.mac of the component MAC Address Handler. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-265078 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||