Export limit exceeded: 11069 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11069 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2013-0454 | 3 Canonical, Ibm, Samba | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Storwize, Samba | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The SMB2 implementation in Samba 3.6.x before 3.6.6, as used on the IBM Storwize V7000 Unified 1.3 before 1.3.2.3 and 1.4 before 1.4.0.1 and possibly other products, does not properly enforce CIFS share attributes, which allows remote authenticated users to (1) write to a read-only share; (2) trigger data-integrity problems related to the oplock, locking, coherency, or leases attribute; or (3) have an unspecified impact by leveraging incorrect handling of the browseable or "hide unreadable" parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0005 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008, Windows Vista and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The Client/Server Run-time Subsystem (aka CSRSS) in the Win32 subsystem in Microsoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP2, Vista SP2, and Server 2008 SP2, when a Chinese, Japanese, or Korean system locale is used, can access uninitialized memory during the processing of Unicode characters, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "CSRSS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2013-4777 | 2 Google, Motorola | 2 Android, Defy Xt | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| A certain configuration of Android 2.3.7 on the Motorola Defy XT phone for Republic Wireless uses init to create a /dev/socket/init_runit socket that listens for shell commands, which allows local users to gain privileges by interacting with a LocalSocket object. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4606 | 1 Artsoft | 1 Rocks\'n\'diamonds | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Artsoft Entertainment Rocks'n'Diamonds (aka rocksndiamonds) 3.3.0.1 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on .rocksndiamonds/cache/artworkinfo.cache under a user's home directory. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4605 | 1 Redhat | 6 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The (1) JNDI service, (2) HA-JNDI service, and (3) HAJNDIFactory invoker servlet in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 CP10 and 5.1.2, Web Platform 5.1.2, SOA Platform 4.2.0.CP05 and 4.3.0.CP05, Portal Platform 4.3 CP07 and 5.2.x before 5.2.2, and BRMS Platform before 5.3.0 do not properly restrict write access, which allows remote attackers to add, delete, or modify items in a JNDI tree via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7277 | 1 Otrs | 1 Otrs | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Open Ticket Request System (OTRS) before 2.3.0-beta4 checks for the rw permission, instead of the configured merge permission, during authorization of merge operations, which might allow remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions by merging two tickets. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7279 | 1 Otrs | 1 Otrs | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The CustomerInterface component in Open Ticket Request System (OTRS) before 2.2.8 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and access tickets of arbitrary customers via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7282 | 1 Otrs | 1 Otrs | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Kernel/Output/HTML/CustomerNewTicketQueueSelectionGeneric.pm in Open Ticket Request System (OTRS) before 2.2.6, when the CustomerPanelOwnSelection and CustomerGroupSupport options are enabled, allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions, and perform certain (1) list and (2) write operations on queues, via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7283 | 1 Otrs | 1 Otrs | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Open Ticket Request System (OTRS) before 2.2.6, when customer group support is enabled, allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and perform web-interface updates to tickets by leveraging queue read permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7294 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Google Chrome before 4.0.211.0 cannot properly restrict modifications to cookies established in HTTPS sessions, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to overwrite or delete arbitrary cookies via a Set-Cookie header in an HTTP response, related to lack of the HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) includeSubDomains feature, aka a "cookie forcing" issue. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7295 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Internet Explorer | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Microsoft Internet Explorer cannot properly restrict modifications to cookies established in HTTPS sessions, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to overwrite or delete arbitrary cookies via a Set-Cookie header in an HTTP response, related to lack of the HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) includeSubDomains feature, aka a "cookie forcing" issue. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7296 | 1 Apple | 1 Safari | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apple Safari cannot properly restrict modifications to cookies established in HTTPS sessions, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to overwrite or delete arbitrary cookies via a Set-Cookie header in an HTTP response, related to lack of the HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) includeSubDomains feature, aka a "cookie forcing" issue. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7297 | 1 Opera | 1 Opera Browser | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Opera cannot properly restrict modifications to cookies established in HTTPS sessions, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to overwrite or delete arbitrary cookies via a Set-Cookie header in an HTTP response, related to lack of the HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) includeSubDomains feature, aka a "cookie forcing" issue. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7298 | 2 Android, Google | 2 Android Browser, Android | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The Android browser in Android cannot properly restrict modifications to cookies established in HTTPS sessions, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to overwrite or delete arbitrary cookies via a Set-Cookie header in an HTTP response, related to lack of the HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) includeSubDomains feature, aka a "cookie forcing" issue. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7300 | 1 Sun | 2 Opensolaris, Sunos | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The labeled networking implementation in Solaris Trusted Extensions in Sun Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris snv_39 through snv_67, when a labeled zone is in the installed state, allows remote authenticated users to bypass a Mandatory Access Control (MAC) policy and obtain access to the global zone. | ||||
| CVE-2008-7303 | 1 Apple | 1 Mac Os X | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The nonet and nointernet sandbox profiles in Apple Mac OS X 10.5.x do not propagate restrictions to all created processes, which allows remote attackers to access network resources via a crafted application, as demonstrated by use of launchctl to trigger the launchd daemon's execution of a script file, a related issue to CVE-2011-1516. | ||||
| CVE-2012-4454 | 1 Opencryptoki Project | 1 Opencryptoki | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| openCryptoki before 2.4.1, when using spinlocks, allows local users to create or set world-writable permissions on arbitrary files via a symlink attack on the (1) .pkapi_xpk or (2) .pkcs11spinloc file in /tmp. | ||||
| CVE-2012-1826 | 1 Dotcms | 1 Dotcms | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| dotCMS 1.9 before 1.9.5.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary Java code via a crafted (1) XSLT or (2) Velocity template. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4356 | 1 Celeryproject | 1 Celery | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Celery 2.1 and 2.2 before 2.2.8, 2.3 before 2.3.4, and 2.4 before 2.4.4 changes the effective id but not the real id during processing of the --uid and --gid arguments to celerybeat, celeryd_detach, celeryd-multi, and celeryev, which allows local users to gain privileges via vectors involving crafted code that is executed by the worker process. | ||||
| CVE-2013-3175 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows Rt and 5 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Microsoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows Server 2012, and Windows RT allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed asynchronous RPC request, aka "Remote Procedure Call Vulnerability." | ||||