Export limit exceeded: 13358 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (13358 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-66459 | 2 Space Codes, Wordpress | 2 Ai For Seo, Wordpress | 2026-08-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in AI for SEO <= 2.4.2 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66464 | 2 Toast Plugins, Wordpress | 2 Internal Link Optimiser, Wordpress | 2026-08-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Internal Link Optimiser <= 5.2.7 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66466 | 2 Wedevs, Wordpress | 2 Storegrowth: Smart Sales Booster For Woocommerce | Bogo, Upsells, Direct Checkout, Quick View, Side Cart, Wordpress | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in StoreGrowth: Smart Sales Booster for WooCommerce | BOGO, Upsells, Direct Checkout, Quick View, Side Cart <= 2.1.1 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66469 | 2 Afonso Matos, Wordpress | 2 Arvow Ai Seo Writer, Wordpress | 2026-08-14 | 7.5 High |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Arvow AI SEO Writer <= 1.5.3 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73658 | 1 Triggerdotdev | 1 Trigger.dev | 2026-08-14 | 8.2 High |
| Trigger.dev is a platform for building and deploying fully managed AI agents and workflows. From 4.4.2 until 4.5.0-rc.5, Aws4FetchClient.buildUrl() and Aws4FetchClient.presign() in apps/webapp/app/v3/objectStoreClient.server.ts assign user-controlled packet keys to URL.pathname, while apps/webapp/app/routes/api.v1.packets.$.ts accepts params["*"] without rejecting dot segments and uses findResource: async () => 1 without per-resource ownership validation. WHATWG path normalization collapses .. segments before signing, allowing a caller with a valid environment API key to obtain presigned URLs for another tenant's object-store keys and read or overwrite task payloads. This issue is fixed in version 4.5.0-rc.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27999 | 2 Themefic, Wordpress | 2 Tourfic, Wordpress | 2026-08-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Subscriber Broken Access Control in Tourfic <= 2.23.1 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72673 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 5.4 Medium |
| Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized deletion of Synthetics private locations via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). Synthetics private locations can be shared with more than one space, and deleting one removes it from every space it is shared with. The safeguard that prevented the deletion of a private location still in use evaluated only the monitors visible in the requesting user's own space, so monitors that depend on the private location in other spaces were not taken into account. As a result, an authenticated Kibana user holding the Synthetics write privilege in a single space could delete a private location that other spaces still depend on, even where the user has no access to those spaces. Deleting the private location removes the shared configuration and stops the monitors in the other spaces from running, which suppresses the availability monitoring those spaces rely on. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28188 | 2 Themefic, Wordpress | 2 Hydra Booking, Wordpress | 2026-08-13 | 7.3 High |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Hydra Booking <= 1.2.2 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66689 | 2 Acymailing Newsletter Team, Wordpress | 2 Anti Spam And List Cleaner – Acychecker, Wordpress | 2026-08-13 | 6.3 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Anti Spam and list cleaner – AcyChecker <= 2.0.0 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72675 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 7.1 High |
| Missing Authorization (CWE-862) in Kibana can lead to cross-space information disclosure and unauthorized data modification via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). Kibana Machine Learning carries out its Elasticsearch operations with elevated internal permissions and relies on a per-request space filter to keep the machine learning data of one space separated from another. Part of the Machine Learning functionality did not apply that filter, so operations issued from one space were carried out against the machine learning data of every space in the deployment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72661 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Missing Authorization (CWE-862) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). An internal Kibana data retrieval capability used by Elastic Defend endpoint response actions did not enforce the Security Solution and endpoint privileges that its user-facing equivalents require, and it retrieved data with elevated internal permissions rather than the permissions of the requesting user. As a result, an authenticated low-privileged Kibana user with no Security Solution privileges, endpoint privileges and no Elasticsearch privileges on the underlying data, could read endpoint response action records and the corresponding response content returned by managed hosts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72630 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 7.1 High |
| Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). Fleet restricts some callers to managing integration policies for one specific integration. When an existing integration policy was updated, that restriction was evaluated against the integration recorded on the stored policy rather than against the replacement integration supplied with the update. An authenticated user holding only the Elastic Defend endpoint policy management privilege was therefore able to convert an endpoint policy they administer into a policy for a different integration, and to supply that integration's configuration at the same time. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72665 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 8.1 High |
| Missing Authorization (CWE-862) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized execution of Osquery and Elastic Defend response actions on managed hosts via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A Kibana user who is able to author and evaluate Elastic Security detection rules can cause response actions to be carried out against enrolled agents without holding the Osquery live query privileges or the Elastic Defend response action privileges that normally govern those capabilities. Depending on the response action involved, this can result in disclosure of information from the affected hosts or in unauthorized changes to their state. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59714 | 1 Open-webui | 1 Open-webui | 2026-08-13 | 7.1 High |
| Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.5 before 0.10.0, any authenticated user can overwrite the content of a message in a channel they do not belong to (including private and DM channels) by sending a chat completion request with a channel:-prefixed chat_id and a target message_id. The channel: path routes pipeline output through _make_channel_emitter, which writes to the Messages table using the caller-supplied message_id without binding it to the channel. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73652 | 1 Vantage6 | 1 Vantage6 | 2026-08-13 | N/A |
| vantage6 is an open-source infrastructure for privacy preserving analysis. In version 5.0.2 and earlier, the algorithm-store edit permission lacks an ownership check, allowing one algorithm developer to alter another developer's algorithm while it is pending or under review. The attacker can change metadata including the algorithm image or image tag, causing reviewers and nodes to trust a different image from the one originally submitted for approval. No fixed version is available as of this review. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73401 | 2 Instawp, Wordpress | 2 Instawp Connect, Wordpress | 2026-08-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in InstaWP Connect <= 0.1.3.7 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73653 | 1 Vitest.dev | 1 Vitest | 2026-08-13 | 9.4 Critical |
| Vitest is a testing framework powered by Vite. Prior to versions 3.2.7, 4.1.10, and 5.0.0-beta.6, Browser Mode provider commands including upload, takeScreenshot, screenshotMatcher, stopChunkTrace, deleteTracing, and annotateTraces accept browser-supplied file paths without enforcing the allowWrite permission gate or confining paths to the project root. A client that can reach the Browser Mode API can read arbitrary local files, create or overwrite image and trace files, or delete files accessible to the Vitest process even when allowWrite is false. This issue is fixed in versions 3.2.7, 4.1.10, and 5.0.0-beta.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64676 | 1 Katacontainers | 1 Kata-containers | 2026-08-13 | 5.7 Medium |
| Kata Containers is an open source implementation of lightweight Virtual Machines (VMs) that perform like containers. In versions prior to 4.0.0, the kata-agent is vulnerable to an authorization bypass in confidential-guest memory management. In Confidential Containers (CoCo) deployments, the kata-agent enforces an OPA/Rego-based AgentPolicy that must authorize every ttRPC API call, forming the security boundary that prevents an untrusted host from directing the confidential guest. Two ttRPC methods introduced with the mem-agent feature are missing this authorization check, so an untrusted host can invoke them unconditionally regardless of the guest's policy configuration. When mem-agent is enabled (off by default), this lets the host tamper with in-guest memory management by forcing swap, aggressive eviction, or compaction, resulting in attacker-controlled availability and performance degradation of the confidential workload entirely outside the agent-policy boundary. The impact does not include memory disclosure or code execution, and severity is bounded by the precondition that mem-agent must be explicitly enabled. This issue is fixed in version 4.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57897 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-08-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Cross-Repo Information Disclosure via Org-Level Actions Run/Job APIs | ||||
| CVE-2026-45808 | 1 Openbao | 1 Openbao | 2026-08-13 | N/A |
| OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.5.4, OpenBao's namespaces provide multi-tenant separation. A tenant who intentionally leaks lease identifiers can have their lease and underlying credential revoked or renewed by a user in another tenant via the legacy, undocumented `sys/revoke` and `sys/renew` endpoints. This is fixed in OpenBao v2.5.4. | ||||