Export limit exceeded: 398557 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 398557 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (398557 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-92289 | 2026-09-26 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Lemonldap::NG::Portal versions from 2.23.0 before 2.23.4 for Perl allow a PKCE bypass for public Relying Parties in "PKCE or secret" mode because checkEndPointAuthenticationCredentials does not verify the client secret. With oidcRPMetaDataOptionsRequirePKCE set to 2, the authorization endpoint issues a code even when the request carries no code_challenge, and token() admits the exchange as long as a challenge was stored or an authentication method was returned for the caller. checkEndPointAuthenticationCredentials() skips the secret comparison for a Relying Party marked public and still returns the method deduced from the request, so any Basic or form credential satisfies the secret branch. validatePKCEChallenge() then passes, because neither a challenge nor a verifier is present. An attacker who intercepts an authorization code issued to a public Relying Party can exchange it for the user's access, ID and refresh tokens by replaying the client_id with an arbitrary secret, which is the attack PKCE prevents. Dynamic client registration creates every Relying Party in this mode. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89276 | 3 Adobe, Linux, Microsoft | 4 Campaign, Campaign Classic, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-09-26 | 9.9 Critical |
| Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89237 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Bluff Post | 2026-09-26 | 6.8 Medium |
| The Bluff Post WordPress plugin through 1.1.1 does not sanitise and escape parameters before using them as identifiers in a SQL query, allowing unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL and extract sensitive information from the database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88840 | 2 Busybox, Redhat | 3 Busybox, Hardened Images, Hummingbird | 2026-09-26 | 5.3 Medium |
| BusyBox TLS get_client_hello() reads past the end of the input buffer when parsing a truncated ClientHello message. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85984 | 2 Cyberlord92, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Miniorange Otp Login, Verification And Sms Notifications, Miniorange Otp Login, Verification And Sms Notifications | 2026-09-26 | 9.8 Critical |
| The miniOrange OTP Login, Verification and SMS Notifications plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass via the mo_wp_login_intent parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.5.5. This is due to a missing password-intent guard in the skip_pass_fallback-enabled configuration branch of the mo_by_pass_login() function, which treats administrator role membership alone as sufficient authentication whenever the unauthenticated, unverified POST parameter mo_wp_login_intent is submitted with the value otp, causing mo_get_user() to skip wp_authenticate_username_password() and resolve a WP_User purely from a username lookup. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as any existing administrator account by supplying only a known username and an empty password alongside mo_wp_login_intent=otp, with no password or OTP verification required. Exploitation is conditional on a site administrator having simultaneously enabled the following plugin options: WP Login OTP, Login with Only OTP, Allow Users to Login with Username and Password, and Admin OTP Bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85081 | 2026-09-26 | 7.5 High | ||
| The File Manager WordPress plugin before 8.0.5, FileOrganizer WordPress plugin before 1.2.1, File Manager Pro WordPress plugin before 2.1.3 do not correctly validate the origin of window messages received by the file browser they load on their admin screens, accepting any origin that is a leading string prefix of the site's own address, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to run arbitrary JavaScript in the session of a logged-in administrator who visits a page under their control. The defect is in the file-manager library all three bundle, and every version below 2.1.70 carries it. Updating the bundled library closes it. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84724 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside | 2026-09-26 | 6.6 Medium |
| An argument-injection flaw was found in the Ansible Automation Platform automation-controller system-job subsystem. The system-job template launch endpoint stores a user-supplied "days" variable without running the integer validation defined elsewhere for that field, and the dispatcher flattens the management-command argument list into a single string with spaces before the job runner re-splits it, so spaces in the value become additional command-line arguments. Because system jobs are executed in-process on the control node without the container isolation applied to all other job types, an authenticated user with superuser privileges can inject arbitrary arguments — including Python's path option — into the control-plane awx-manage process, controlling its argument vector and the first entry of its module search path. Full remote code execution requires an additional import gadget that is not present in the current management commands, so the demonstrated impact is argument injection with control of the process search path rather than confirmed code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84717 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside | 2026-09-26 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Ansible Automation Platform automation-controller. The unauthenticated Bitbucket Data Center webhook receiver skips HMAC signature verification for diagnostics:ping events after it has already looked up the target template, causing the endpoint to return HTTP 200 for a template that has a Bitbucket DC webhook configured and HTTP 403 otherwise. An unauthenticated remote attacker can use this response discrepancy as an oracle to enumerate which Job Template and Workflow Job Template IDs have Bitbucket DC webhooks configured, without knowing the secret webhook_key. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84706 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside | 2026-09-26 | 7.6 High |
| A flaw was found in Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. The custom Credential Type environment-variable injector validates variable names against a deny-list (an ANSIBLE_* prefix check plus a fixed ENV_BLOCKLIST) that omits process-hijacking loader variables such as BASH_ENV, ENV, LD_PRELOAD, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, PYTHONSTARTUP and GIT_SSH_COMMAND. Combined with the credential file injector, a privileged user can write an attacker-controlled script into the execution environment and point BASH_ENV at it, obtaining arbitrary code execution inside the execution-environment container for any job that attaches a credential of that type. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84499 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside | 2026-09-26 | 7.7 High |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation- controller. Survey questions of type password are write-only and stored encrypted, displayed only as a placeholder on read. When a schedule or workflow job template node is revalidated against a tightened survey specification, the controller decrypts the stored password and includes its plaintext value in the minimum/maximum length validation error message returned in the HTTP response. A user with the delegated JobTemplate Admin role can tighten the survey length constraint and trigger revalidation of a schedule or node created by another, higher-privileged user, thereby recovering that user's stored password in plaintext. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84096 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Wp Review Slider Pro | 2026-09-26 | 8.0 High |
| The wp-review-slider-pro WordPress plugin before 12.7.12 does not perform a capability check on the AJAX handler that saves its review submission forms, and the nonce protecting it is generated for every visitor, allowing any authenticated user, such as a subscriber, to overwrite a live form with field values that are output without escaping on public pages, leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84095 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Wp Review Slider Pro | 2026-09-26 | 8.0 High |
| The wp-review-slider-pro WordPress plugin before 12.7.12 does not perform a capability check on one of its AJAX handlers, and the nonce protecting it is generated for every visitor, allowing any authenticated user, such as a subscriber, to store arbitrary review content which is later output without escaping on public pages, leading to Stored Cross-Site Scripting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83964 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Adobe Connect, Adobe Connect Android Mobile App, Connect and 3 more | 2026-09-26 | 6.2 Medium |
| Adobe Connect is affected by an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to disclose sensitive information. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82901 | 2026-09-26 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The Ultra Addons for Contact Form 7 plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload due to insufficient file type validation in the 'uacf7_wpcf7_mail_components' function in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.50. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Note: This is only exploitable when the plugin's PDF Generator module is enabled, which is disabled by default. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82300 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-09-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). | ||||
| CVE-2026-82294 | 1 Elastic | 1 Elasticsearch | 2026-09-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). | ||||
| CVE-2026-82013 | 3 Adobe, Linux, Microsoft | 4 Campaign, Campaign Classic, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-09-26 | 9.9 Critical |
| Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82003 | 3 Adobe, Linux, Microsoft | 4 Campaign, Campaign Classic, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-09-26 | 8.5 High |
| Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81548 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-26 | 8.8 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81537 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-26 | 8.8 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to OS command injection. | ||||