Export limit exceeded: 10370 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 369503 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 10370 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10370 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-12970 | 1 Apache2triad | 1 Apache2triad | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Apache2Triad 1.5.4 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of authenticated users for requests that (1) add or (2) delete user accounts via a request to phpsftpd/users.php. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12881 | 1 Spring Batch Admin Project | 1 Spring Batch Admin | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Spring Batch Admin before 1.3.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims and submit arbitrary requests, such as exploiting the file upload vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12303 | 1 Cisco | 1 Asyncos | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) file filtering feature of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured AMP file filtering rule. The file types affected are zipped or archived file types. The vulnerability is due to incorrect and different file hash values when AMP scans the file. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted email file attachment through the targeted device. An exploit could allow the attacker to bypass a configured AMP file filter. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf52943. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12271 | 1 Cisco | 4 Spa300 Firmware, Spa300 Series Ip Phone, Spa500 Firmware and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability in Cisco SPA300 and SPA500 Series IP Phones could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to a lack of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking the user of a web application into executing an adverse action. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuz88421, CSCuz91356, CSCve56308. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1218 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Platform | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 123858. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11726 | 1 Connectwise | 1 Manage | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| services/system_io/actionprocessor/System.rails in ConnectWise Manage 2017.5 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), as demonstrated by changing an e-mail address setting. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11680 | 1 Project Hashtopussy | 1 Hashtopussy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists in Hashtopussy 0.4.0, allowing an admin password change via users.php. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11679 | 1 Hashtopus Project | 1 Hashtopus | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists in Hashtopus 1.5g via the password parameter to admin.php in an a=config action. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11648 | 1 Techroutes | 2 Tr 1803-3g, Tr 1803-3g Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Techroutes TR 1803-3G Wireless Cellular Router/Modem 2.4.25 devices do not possess any protection against a CSRF vulnerability, as demonstrated by a goform/BasicSettings request to disable port filtering. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11646 | 1 Netcomm | 2 4gt101w Bootloader, 4gt101w Software | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| NetComm Wireless 4GT101W routers with Hardware: 0.01 / Software: V1.1.8.8 / Bootloader: 1.1.3 are vulnerable to CSRF attacks, as demonstrated by using administration.html to disable the firewall. They does not contain any token that can mitigate CSRF vulnerabilities within the device. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10678 | 1 Piwigo | 1 Piwigo | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Piwigo through 2.9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to delete permalinks via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10677 | 1 Linksys | 2 Ea4500, Ea4500 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) exists on Linksys EA4500 devices with Firmware Version before 2.1.41.164606, as demonstrated by a request to apply.cgi to disable SIP. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10681 | 1 Piwigo | 1 Piwigo | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Piwigo through 2.9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to unlock albums via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10680 | 1 Piwigo | 1 Piwigo | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Piwigo through 2.9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to change a private album to public via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000147 | 1 Mahara | 1 Mahara | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Mahara 1.9 before 1.9.8 and 1.10 before 1.10.6 and 15.04 before 15.04.3 are vulnerable to perform a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on the uploader contained in Mahara's filebrowser widget. This could allow an attacker to trick a Mahara user into unknowingly uploading malicious files into their Mahara account. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000093 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Poll Scm | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Poll SCM Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to initiate polling of projects with a known name. While Jenkins in general does not consider polling to be a protection-worthy action as it's similar to cache invalidation, the plugin specifically adds a permission to be able to use this functionality, and this issue undermines that permission. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000092 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Git, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Git Plugin connects to a user-specified Git repository as part of form validation. An attacker with no direct access to Jenkins but able to guess at a username/password credentials ID could trick a developer with job configuration permissions into following a link with a maliciously crafted Jenkins URL which would result in the Jenkins Git client sending the username and password to an attacker-controlled server. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000091 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Github Branch Source | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| GitHub Branch Source Plugin connects to a user-specified GitHub API URL (e.g. GitHub Enterprise) as part of form validation and completion (e.g. to verify Scan Credentials are correct). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Overall/Read access to Jenkins to connect to any web server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000090 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Role-based Authorization Strategy | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Role-based Authorization Strategy Plugin was not requiring requests to its API be sent via POST, thereby opening itself to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. This allowed attackers to add administrator role to any user, or to remove the authorization configuration, preventing legitimate access to Jenkins. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000085 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Subversion, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Subversion Plugin connects to a user-specified Subversion repository as part of form validation (e.g. to retrieve a list of tags). This functionality improperly checked permissions, allowing any user with Item/Build permission (but not Item/Configure) to connect to any web server or Subversion server and send credentials with a known ID, thereby possibly capturing them. Additionally, this functionality did not require POST requests be used, thereby allowing the above to be performed without direct access to Jenkins via Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. | ||||