Export limit exceeded: 388850 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (388850 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-73475 | 2 Centarro, Drupal | 2 Commerce Paypal, Commerce Paypal | 2026-09-08 | 9.1 Critical |
| Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Commerce PayPal allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Commerce PayPal versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.12.0, from 2.0.0 to 2.1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85046 | 1 Google | 2 Chrome, V8 | 2026-09-08 | 8.8 High |
| Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 152.0.7977.82 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-74866 | 1 Fastify | 2 Busboy, Fastify\/busyboy | 2026-09-08 | 5.8 Medium |
| @fastify/busboy is a multipart form-data parser for Node.js. Its multipart part-header parser splits header lines only on the two-byte carriage-return line-feed sequence, so a lone carriage return or line feed embedded in a part header is not treated as a line break and is carried verbatim into the parsed Content-Disposition filename and field name handed to the application. An attacker who uploads a file whose filename or field name contains a bare carriage return or line feed can inject control characters into consumers that trust the parser to return clean values, enabling filesystem filename pollution, log forging, or header injection when the value is forwarded to a carriage-return-sensitive sink. All versions of @fastify/busboy up to and including 3.2.1 are affected. The issue is fixed in version 3.2.2, which rejects any header line that still contains a bare carriage return or line feed. Users should upgrade to 3.2.2, and consumers such as @fastify/multipart should bump their @fastify/busboy dependency to pull in the fix. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61410 | 2026-09-08 | 9.4 Critical | ||
| Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains a Missing Authorization vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to remote execution. This vulnerability is considered critical because it allows an attacker to execute commands remotely on a target system by sending a specially crafted request to the application, bypassing intended restrictions on code execution.Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73311 | 1 Xenforo | 1 Xenforo | 2026-09-08 | 7.4 High |
| XenForo before 2.3.13 contains an OAuth2 authorization code reuse vulnerability that allows attackers to obtain unauthorized token pairs by submitting a previously used authorization code. Attackers can exploit the failure to invalidate or mark authorization codes as consumed after initial token issuance to receive an independent token pair for the same user and scopes, bypassing the single-use guarantee of the OAuth2 authorization code flow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73318 | 1 Xenforo | 1 Xenforo | 2026-09-08 | 3.8 Low |
| XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the force-agreement controller that allows any ACP administrator to access and submit force-agreement forms regardless of their assigned permissions. Attackers can bypass the option permission declared in the navigation configuration to update the global policy last-updated timestamp, forcing all users to re-agree to the privacy policy or terms of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73321 | 1 Xenforo | 1 Xenforo | 2026-09-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| XenForo before 2.3.13 contains an uncontrolled recursion vulnerability in the BBCode parser that allows authenticated attackers to cause persistent denial of service by submitting a post with deeply nested BBCode tags. Attackers can craft a single malicious post with sufficient nesting depth to exceed PHP's stack limit, causing fatal errors that repeatedly terminate PHP-FPM workers for all visitors rendering the affected thread. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73309 | 1 Xenforo | 1 Xenforo | 2026-09-08 | 7.4 High |
| XenForo before 2.3.13 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the OAuth2 token endpoint that allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain valid token pairs by submitting empty values for client_secret and code_verifier parameters. Attackers can exploit PHP truthy evaluation logic, which treats empty strings as false and skips client secret validation and PKCE code verifier validation, to exchange a valid authorization code for a token pair without proving client identity or holding the PKCE commitment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73313 | 1 Xenforo | 1 Xenforo | 2026-09-08 | 6.8 Medium |
| XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a multi-factor authentication bypass vulnerability in the passkey TFA provider that allows an authenticated attacker to complete login as another user by submitting their own registered passkey credential during the WebAuthn assertion step. The passkey verification path performs a global credential lookup without validating that the matched credential belongs to the user whose login is pending, enabling an attacker who knows a target account's password to sign the challenge with their own passkey and bypass multi-factor authentication on both public forum and ACP login paths. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73316 | 1 Xenforo | 1 Xenforo | 2026-09-08 | 7.5 High |
| XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a payment replay vulnerability in the PayPal REST payment provider that allows attackers to process the same webhook payload multiple times by exploiting a missing duplicate transaction ID check. Attackers can replay a valid webhook payload to trigger duplicate payment events, resulting in repeated subscription activations and unauthorized account upgrades. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73319 | 1 Xenforo | 1 Xenforo | 2026-09-08 | 6.1 Medium |
| XenForo before 2.3.13 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the dynamic redirect handler that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the board origin by crafting a malicious javascript: URI that bypasses host validation. Attackers can embed the board hostname in the URI authority component and use percent-encoded newlines to evade server-side filters, causing authenticated users who perform a Follow action to execute attacker-supplied JavaScript in their browser. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18986 | 2 Drupal, Entity Browser Project | 2 Entity Browser, Entity Browser | 2026-09-08 | 4.8 Medium |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Entity Browser allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Entity Browser versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.16.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16647 | 2 Drupal, Zyxware | 2 Disable Login Page, Disable Login Page | 2026-09-08 | 4.1 Medium |
| Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Drupal Disable Login Page allows Functionality Bypass. This issue affects Disable Login Page versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.1.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64374 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-09-08 | 7.5 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/rt: Have RT_PUSH_IPI be default off for non PREEMPT_RT RT migration is done aggressively. When a CPU schedules out a high priority RT task for a lower priority task, it will look to see if there's any RT tasks that are waiting to run on another CPU that is of higher priority than the task this CPU is about to run. If it finds one, it will pull that task over to the CPU and allow it to run there instead. Normally, this pulling is done by looking at the RT overloaded mask (rto) which contains all the CPUs in the scheduler domain with RT tasks that are waiting to run due to a higher priority RT task currently running on their CPU. The CPU that is about to schedule a lower priority task will grab the rq lock of the overloaded CPU and move the RT task from that CPU's runqueue to the local one and schedule the higher priority RT task. This caused issues when a lot of CPUs would schedule a lower priority task at the same time. They would all try to grab the same runqueue lock of the CPU with the overloaded RT tasks. Only the first CPU that got in will get that task. All the others would wait until they got the runqueue lock and see there's nothing to pull and do nothing. On systems with lots of CPUs, this caused a large latency (up to 500us) which is beyond what PREEMPT_RT is to allow. The solution to that was to create an RT_PUSH_IPI logic. When any CPU wanted to pull a task, instead of grabbing the runqueue lock of the overloaded CPU, it would start by sending an IPI to the overloaded CPU, and that IPI handler would have the CPU with the waiting RT task do a push instead. Then that handler would send an IPI to the next CPU with overloaded RT tasks, and so on. Note, after the first CPU starts this process, if another CPU wanted to do a pull, it would see that the process has already begun and would only increment a counter to have the IPIs continue again. The RT_PUSH_IPI solved the latency problem with PREEMPT_RT but could cause a new issue with non PREEMPT_RT. Namely, softirqs run in a threaded context on PREEMPT_RT but they can run in an interrupt context in non-RT. If an IPI lands on a CPU that has just woken up multiple RT tasks and the current CPU is running a non RT or a low priority RT task, instead of doing a push, it would simply do a schedule on that CPU. But if a softirq was also executing on this CPU, the schedule would need to wait until the softirq finished. Until then, the CPU would still be considered overloaded as there are RT tasks still waiting to run on it. A live lock occurred on a workload that was doing heavy networking traffic on a large machine where the softirqs would run 500us out of 750us. And it would also be waking up RT tasks, causing the RT pull logic to be constantly executed. When a softirq triggered on a CPU with RT tasks queued but not running yet, and the other CPUs would see this CPU as being overloaded, they would send an IPI over to it. The CPU would notice that the waiting RT tasks are of higher priority than the currently running task and simply schedule that CPU instead. But because the softirq was executing, before it could schedule, it would receive another IPI to do the same. The amount of IPIs would slow down the currently running softirq so much that before it could return back to task context, it would execute another softirq never allowing the CPU to schedule. This live locked that CPU. As RT_PUSH_IPI was created to help PREEMPT_RT, make it default off if PREEMPT_RT is not enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70614 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70613 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16233 | 1 Ni | 1 Labview | 2026-09-08 | 7.8 High |
| There is a memory corruption vulnerability recently discovered in NI LabVIEW that may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2026 Q3 (26.3.0) and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18445 | 1 Ni | 1 Labview | 2026-09-08 | 6.6 Medium |
| There is an integer overflow vulnerability resulting in an out-of-bounds write recently discovered in NI LabVIEW. This may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI file. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2026 Q3 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64375 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-09-08 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: proc: protect ptrace_may_access() with exec_update_lock (FD links) proc_pid_get_link() and proc_pid_readlink() currently look up the task from the pid once, then do the ptrace access check on that task, then look up the task from the pid a second time to do the actual access. That's racy in several ways. To fix it, pass the task to the ->proc_get_link() handler, and instead of proc_fd_access_allowed(), introduce a new helper call_proc_get_link() that looks up and locks the task, does the access check, and calls ->proc_get_link(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-18444 | 1 Ni | 1 Labview | 2026-09-08 | 6.6 Medium |
| There is an integer conversion vulnerability resulting in an out-of-bounds read when loading images recently discovered in NI LabVIEW. This may result in information disclosure or arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires an attacker to get a user to open a specially crafted VI file. This vulnerability affects NI LabVIEW 2026 Q3 and prior versions. | ||||