Export limit exceeded: 364840 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 364840 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2852 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-13879 | 2 Wordpress, Xwp | 2 Wordpress, Stream | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| The Stream plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.0.2 due to insufficient validation on the webhook feature. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13957 | 1 Abb | 3 Aspect Enterprise, Matrix Series, Nexus Series | 2026-04-15 | 7.6 High |
| SSRF Server Side Request Forgery vulnerabilities exist in ASPECT if administrator credentials become compromisedThis issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.*; NEXUS Series: through 3.*; MATRIX Series: through 3.*. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22219 | 1 Terminalfour | 2 Terminalfour, Xml Jdbc | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in Terminalfour 8.0.0001 through 8.3.18 and XML JDBC versions up to 1.0.4 allows authenticated users to submit malicious XML via unspecified features which could lead to various actions such as accessing the underlying server, remote code execution (RCE), or performing Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22262 | 1 Redhat | 1 Apache Camel Spring Boot | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| Applications that use UriComponentsBuilder to parse an externally provided URL (e.g. through a query parameter) AND perform validation checks on the host of the parsed URL may be vulnerable to a open redirect https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/601.html attack or to a SSRF attack if the URL is used after passing validation checks. This is the same as CVE-2024-22259 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22259 and CVE-2024-22243 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22243 , but with different input. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2663 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| The ZD YouTube FLV Player plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6 via the $_GET['image'] parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2796 | 1 Akana | 1 Akana Api Platform | 2026-04-15 | 9.3 Critical |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) was discovered in the Akana API Platform in versions prior to and including 2022.1.3. Reported by Jakob Antonsson. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3448 | 1 Mautic | 1 Mautic | 2026-04-15 | 5 Medium |
| Users with low privileges can perform certain AJAX actions. In this vulnerability instance, improper access to ajax?action=plugin:focus:checkIframeAvailability leads to a Server-Side Request Forgery by analyzing the error messages returned from the back-end. Allowing an attacker to perform a port scan in the back-end. At the time of publication of the CVE no patch is available. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34580 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Apache XML Security for C++ through 2.0.4 implements the XML Signature Syntax and Processing (XMLDsig) specification without protection against an SSRF payload in a KeyInfo element. NOTE: the project disputes this CVE Record on the grounds that any vulnerabilities are the result of a failure to configure XML Security for C++ securely. Even when avoiding this particular issue, any use of this library would need considerable additional code and a deep understanding of the standards and protocols involved to arrive at a secure implementation for any particular use case. We recommend against continued direct use of this library. | ||||
| CVE-2024-34581 | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High | ||
| The W3C XML Signature Syntax and Processing (XMLDsig) specification, starting with 1.0, was originally published with a "RetrievalMethod is a URI ... that may be used to obtain key and/or certificate information" statement and no accompanying information about SSRF risks, and this may have contributed to vulnerable implementations such as those discussed in CVE-2023-36661 and CVE-2024-21893. NOTE: this was mitigated in 1.1 and 2.0 via a directly referenced Best Practices document that calls on implementers to be wary of SSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39687 | 1 Dahlia | 1 Fedify | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub and other standards. At present, when Fedify needs to retrieve an object or activity from a remote activitypub server, it makes a HTTP request to the `@id` or other resources present within the activity it has received from the web. This activity could reference an `@id` that points to an internal IP address, allowing an attacker to send request to resources internal to the fedify server's network. This applies to not just resolution of documents containing activities or objects, but also to media URLs as well. Specifically this is a Server Side Request Forgery attack. Users should upgrade to Fedify version 0.9.2, 0.10.1, or 0.11.1 to receive a patch for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40632 | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low | ||
| Linkerd is an open source, ultralight, security-first service mesh for Kubernetes. In affected versions when the application being run by linkerd is susceptible to SSRF, an attacker could potentially trigger a denial-of-service (DoS) attack by making requests to localhost:4191/shutdown. Linkerd could introduce an optional environment variable to control a token that must be passed as a header. Linkerd should reject shutdown requests that do not include this header. This issue has been addressed in release version edge-24.6.2 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40718 | 1 Veeam | 2 Backup For Nutanix Ahv, Backup For Oracle Linux Virtualization Manager And Red Hat Virtualization | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A server side request forgery vulnerability allows a low-privileged user to perform local privilege escalation through exploiting an SSRF vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42182 | 2026-04-15 | 2.5 Low | ||
| BigFix Patch Download Plug-ins are affected by Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. It may allow the application to download files from an internally hosted server on localhost. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45317 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Sma1000 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SMA1000 appliance firmware versions 12.4.3-02676 and earlier allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause the SMA1000 server-side application to make requests to an unintended IP address. | ||||
| CVE-2024-46947 | 1 Northern.tech | 1 Mender | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Northern.tech Mender before 3.6.6 and 3.7.x before 3.7.7 allows SSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47578 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Adobe Document Service allows an attacker with administrator privileges to send a crafted request from a vulnerable web application. It is usually used to target internal systems behind firewalls that are normally inaccessible to an attacker from the external network, resulting in a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability. On successful exploitation, the attacker can read or modify any file and/or make the entire system unavailable. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4789 | 2 Stylemixthemes, Wordpress | 2 Cost Calculator Builder Pro, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| Cost Calculator Builder Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to 3.1.72, via the send_demo_webhook() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51358 | 1 Linuxserver | 1 Heimdall Application Dashboard | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue in Linux Server Heimdall v.2.6.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted script to the Add new application. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51980 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| An unauthenticated attacker may perform a limited server side request forgery (SSRF), forcing the target device to open a TCP connection to an arbitrary port number on an arbitrary IP address. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing ReplyTo element in a Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) SOAP request. The attacker can not control the data sent in the SSRF connection, nor can the attacker receive any data back. This SSRF is suitable for TCP port scanning of an internal network when the Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) is exposed across a network segment. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51981 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| An unauthenticated attacker may perform a blind server side request forgery (SSRF), due to a CLRF injection issue that can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing feature used during a WS-Eventing subscription SOAP operation. The attacker can control all the HTTP data sent in the SSRF connection, but the attacker can not receive any data back from this connection. | ||||